Search for: "Goldstein v. California"
Results 301 - 320
of 560
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2009, 7:25 am
See above all the California case of Bindrim v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:23 am
The Court’s decision in Burwell v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 2:10 pm
Golan v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am
Harris 13-1313Issue: Whether the Commerce Clause allows California to impose a complete ban on the sale of wholesome, USDA-approved poultry products from other States and countries - in this case, foie gras - based solely on the agricultural methods used by out-of-state farmers who raise their animals entirely beyond California's borders. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am
Yesterday, in Trump v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 3:36 am
Regents of the University of California. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 12:21 pm
[Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in California Public Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 12:56 pm
ACTION NOTICE DATE CLAIM DUE DATE 2013-101 SEC v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 1:30 am
Additionally, "[t]he act of human creation—and how to best encourage human individuals to engage in that creation, and thereby promote science and the useful arts—was thus central to American copyright from its very inception".The requirement for human authorship has also been followed and kept as copyright laws have evolved, with the Supreme Court consistently ruling that it is a crucial requirement for copyright protection (e.g. in Sarony above, Mazer v… [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 1:30 am
Additionally, "[t]he act of human creation—and how to best encourage human individuals to engage in that creation, and thereby promote science and the useful arts—was thus central to American copyright from its very inception".The requirement for human authorship has also been followed and kept as copyright laws have evolved, with the Supreme Court consistently ruling that it is a crucial requirement for copyright protection (e.g. in Sarony above, Mazer v… [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 3:31 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California in Pecover. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:07 am
Alsup of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California may go down in history as the only U.S. judge ever to have found that code related to application programming interfaces (APIs) is not copyrightable only because it's related to APIs. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
Iskanian, 14-341 allows us to linger a bit longer in California. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 6:26 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell served as co-counsel to petitioner Eric Greene.] [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 5:31 am
” At the National Review’s Bench Memos, Roger Clegg notes recent developments in California that, in his view, bolster the state’s case in Schuette v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 6:52 am
Disclaimer: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:05 am
His dormant commerce clause decisions demonstrated this tendency: Whether it was a solid waste processing company challenging a municipal ordinance (C & A Carbone) or a California winery challenging state limits on alcohol distribution (Granholm v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 11:51 am
Arguments in Friedrichs v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:13 pm
In Mellouli v. [read post]
