Search for: "Good v. Roy"
Results 301 - 320
of 452
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2017, 1:02 pm
Sebelius and King v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
(IPEG) Denmark Revamp of Danish PTO English language site – invitation for help from users (Class 46) Europe ECJ gives Copad ruling on exhaustion and luxury goods; interpretation of Article 8(2) leads to new questions: Copad SA v Christian Dior couture SA, Vincent Gladel, as liquidator of Société industrielle lingerie (Class 46) (IPKat) Anti-patent rally; criticism of practice of patenting biological processes - Munich… [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:26 pm
Search ads v. other online ads. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 5:10 am
A reading of the said sub-section makes it clear that the jurisdiction to make an interim arbitral award is left to the good sense of the arbitral tribunal, and that it extends to ‘any matter’ with respect to which it may make a final arbitral award. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
As a result, the Nokia v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 4:27 pm
In Arias v. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 5:19 pm
Regards, Roy] Mike's Analysis of QQ # 81That is certainly an unenviable position. [read post]
28 May 2023, 4:46 pm
” Kagan v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 2:53 pm
See Roy v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 6:26 pm
Regards, Roy.] [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:24 am
A katpat to Roy Crozier (of the victorious Clarke Willmott LLP) for his prompting in getting this note up and running. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 5:54 am
He was a good old-fashioned lawyer but a really bad lawyer for the modern age. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 11:29 am
Morison (as well as Carpenter v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am
The newspaper “is suffering its biggest crisis since Rupert Murdoch acquired it in 1969,” writes Roy Greenslade. [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:53 am
There is a very good analysis of the poll and its defects by Martin Moore of Media Standards Trust on his blog. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 5:01 pm
Regards, Roy] Joel's Analysis You raise a good question about whether a “disparate impact” claim can successfully allege discrimination based on color. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
It does no good. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:50 am
" pjblack.me/yELU4i Image via Wikipedia from phil coorey in the sydney morning herald: "Gillard v Rudd: the numbers" pjblack.me/wTYzsU #auspol from @THResq: "'John Carter' Author's Estate Sues Over 'Pornographic' Comic Book Knockoffs" pjblack.me/yWpPiN "Any good product leads to porn": "Former designer of Pinterest now lets you sell stuff on a link" pjblack.me/A1kaRU interesting… [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 6:10 am
Regards, Roy [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 8:57 am
Is this true/good doctrine today? [read post]
