Search for: "Gordon R. Smith"
Results 301 - 320
of 492
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2021, 6:33 am
Firm D R D% Berger Montague $563,692 $0 100.0% Grant & Eisenhoffer $379,781 $0 100.0% Kaplan Fox $77,572 $0 100.0% Hagens Berman $71,775 $0 100.0% Hausfeld $35,142 $0 100.0% Berman Tabacco $21,182 $0 100.0% Joseph Saveri Law $6,284 $0 100.0% MoginRubin LLP $5,231 $0 100.0% Bernstein Liebhard $635 $0 100.0% Lief Cabraser $764,357 $30 100.0% Herman, Herman $284,946 $15 100.0% Bernstein Litowitz $205,015 … [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 4:29 am
Gordon Smith, Alan R. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 10:55 pm
Lody Jean (Incumbent)- she has not yet qualified- she has raised $144,075 from 432 contributors and loaned her campaign $60,000 Tahya Fuenmayor- she has not yet qualified- she has raised $27,775 from 39 contributors and loaned her campaign $35,000- she is currently an attorney with Gonzalez & Assoc., where she handles PIP suitsGROUP 38: Gordon Murray Sr. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 9:00 am
Smith v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 9:00 am
Smith v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 3:05 pm
Gordon R.A. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
American Commercial Arbitration Rules R-46 (2013). [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 9:35 am
Kassouf John Frederick Tate Jesse R. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 4:40 am
Laurel Gordon, Deputy Ombuds, Office of the Ombuds, U.S. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am
Maxwell, R. v [2010] UKSC 48 (20 July 2011) Supreme Court: by 3-2 majority, it was right to order retrial of man accused of murder despite gross police misconduct New Judgment: R v Smith (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 37 « UKSC blog In a post on some of the interesting judgments which came out last week, Obiter J described R v Smith as a case concerning Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) under the Criminal Justice Act 2003 s225(3) as… [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 10:12 am
But it does make you — or at least it, or something vaguely like it, makes Gordon Smith and Christine Hurt think … as they do so well on their Conglomerate blog … about what an all-female law school might look like, and why. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:22 pm
., Gordon v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 9:23 am
The subcommittee will hear testimony from Gordon Smith, president and CEO of the National Association of Broadcasters; Tracie Collins, secretary of the New Mexico Department of Health; and Yonaira Rivera, a professor at the Rutgers University School of Communication and Information. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 2:09 pm
Co-counsel on the case is respected California attorneys Frederic Gordon and Richard Waite. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 8:41 am
Smith, who worked as a loan officer for Pisgah Community Bank was sentenced to nine months in prison, and Andrew Hager was sentenced to eight months in prison in connection with the Seven Falls scheme. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 10:05 am
Berle argued for the shareholder primacy theory which states that the corporation exists to make money for shareholders ( a hat tip here to Professor Gordon Smith’s 1998 article The Shareholder Primacy Norm, 23 J. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 3:38 pm
As a side note, the 4th District (the tan one above) has ruled that such a claim cannot stand if the requirements of the act are not met in Smith v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 9:35 am
Smith.) 2. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 5:03 am
Compliance Building by Doug Cornelius Conference Board Governance Blog Editor, Gary Larkin The Conglomerate By Seven Law Professors blog about business, law, economics and society, including Gordon Smith, BYU Law School, Christine Hurt, Univ. of Illinois College of Law, Vic Fleischer, Univ. of Colorado Law School, Fred Tung, Emory Law School, Lisa Fairfax, George Washington Univ. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm
The claim was on the basis ofan implied obligation to keep the retained parts in repair or alternatively a common law duty as adjoining occupier to remedy any defect in those premises which was capable of causing damage to the demised premises.At trial of the damages counterclaim, Judge Cowell accepted that there was an implied duty on CHA to remedy any defects in the retained parts that would cause damage to the demised properties.He based this on the decision in Hargroves, Aronson & Co v… [read post]