Search for: "Grace v. Grace" Results 301 - 320 of 2,009
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2021, 3:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Alrose Steinway, LLC v Jaspan Schlesinger, LLP  2021 NY Slip Op 30619(U) March 5, 2021Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 151482/2017 Judge: Andrea Masley is a long, reasoned and detailed discussion of a legal malpractice claim based upon a projection of future commercial events. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 6:01 am by Eugene Volokh
What if you're an adjunct teaching trademark law; can you safely say "The Slants," the subject of the leading Supreme Court case Matal v. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Under the (perhaps largely defunct) “Lemon test” from Lemon v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 7:26 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Gleckel and Grace Brosofsky (Cornell University - Law School and Independent) have posted Trump v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 2:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Registration can occur w/o use; no examination for use; 5 year grace period for use. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 9:54 am by Linda McClain
At the same time, “gender policy” may also encompass a broader range of issues, such as the Administration’s commitment to combating discrimination based ongender identity and sexual orientation, understood as forms of “sex discrimination” (in light of Bostock v. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 5:24 am by CJ Kim and Celine Collis
Breach of a condition – a condition is a term goes to the root of a contract (Poussard v Spiers and Pond (1876) 1 QBD 410). [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Tia Sewell
Once Pack was confirmed in June, it became clear that Liu and Cunningham would not remain in his “good graces. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 3:40 pm by Robert Liles
  Case Example Where the Government Sought to Pierce the Corporate Veil of a Home Health Agency: In United States v. [read post]