Search for: "Grand v. Hope" Results 301 - 320 of 862
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2008, 6:11 pm
  In Kopecky v Slovakia (2005) 41 EHRR 944  it was said that A1P1 "does not guarantee the right to acquire property". [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 1:36 am
Unfortunately for the plaintiff, the Court’s outcome was not as romantic as she hoped (#YulianacometoEurope? [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 2:13 pm by Ralf Michaels
Similar to previous cases, such as Mennesson v France, Labassee v France, andParadiso and Campanelli v Italy, this complaint originated from the refusal of national authorities to recognise the parent-child relationship established in accordance with foreign law on the ground that surrogacy is prohibited under national law. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 8:27 pm
This post is about a case in which a suspect's proffer didn't work out as he had hoped. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 6:12 am
Lagrotteria informed Garravito-Garcia that he had identified TJ Import Produce as a potential recipient of the cocaine the conspirators hoped to import. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 8:38 am by Lauren Ellerman
I salute his attorney and hope more courts will do the same. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 12:29 pm by Ilya Somin
Whatever the en banc court decides on the statutory question, I hope it will not go down this dangerous road. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 11:29 am by Joe Palazzolo
He pointed to the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in Dirks v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:00 pm by Stephen A. Spitz
It is a story I hope to share with these future law students about why – even in this age of endless criticism about law / lawyer / law schools – there remains something very grand, and great, and honorable, about this profession. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:06 am by Albert W. Alschuler
” The first grand jury is looking at nonviolent efforts to block the transfer of power; the second, at violent efforts. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 7:14 am by E. R. Wrigley
Underpinning the decision in this case are two key cases, N v Home Secretary [2005] UKHL 31 and D v United Kingdom (1997) 24 EHRR 423. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 1:00 am by INFORRM
A third is a recognition that, as the … [Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights] put it in Hrico v Slovakia 49418/99 (2005) 41 EHRR 18, [2004] ECHR 365 (20 July 2004) [40](g) “There is little scope under Article 10(2) of the Convention for restrictions on … questions of public interest …”. [read post]