Search for: "Grant Harrison"
Results 301 - 320
of 711
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2012, 4:00 am
Babie and Neville Grant Rochow, SC, Protecting Religious Freedom under Bills of Rights: Australia as Microcosm, (P. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 4:58 pm
Plaintiff, Deborah Harrison, personal representative of the estate of Charles Kevin Jones, brought suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 8:25 am
Twelve of the war-serving Presidents were military generals: Washington, Jackson, both Harrisons, Taylor, Pierce, Andrew Johnson, Grant, Hayes, Garfield, Arthur, and Eisenhower. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 9:03 pm
On the other hand, Harrison contends that Section 706 does not mean courts should invalidate agency action at all. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 5:01 am
Avoiding FLSA liability for internships — via HR Hero Line Overtime Rule Remains in Limbo as Fifth Circuit Grants the DOL’s Request for Another Extension — via Wage & Hour Defense Blog Minimum-wage hikes do close restaurants. [read post]
25 May 2018, 10:26 am
Theodore Strange as defendants, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant the motion except as to adding Dr. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 1:00 pm
After police succeeded in lobbying against it, a lawsuit was initiated that same year under the state’s Government Data Collection and Dissemination Act on behalf of Fairfax resident Harrison Neal challenging the Fairfax County Police Department’s (FCPD) collection of ALPR data where there was no suspicion of criminal activity. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 5:01 am
Avoiding FLSA liability for internships — via HR Hero Line Overtime Rule Remains in Limbo as Fifth Circuit Grants the DOL’s Request for Another Extension — via Wage & Hour Defense Blog Minimum-wage hikes do close restaurants. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 10:41 am
Now, I wouldn't necessarily blame someone who would argue in a U.S. technology industry dispute that a state court in a small and thinly-populated state might be "provincial" by comparison to, say, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.But for someone supporting Ericsson against Samsung, it's utterly stupid to call the Wuhan court "provincial":Wuhan is the most populous city in Central China with a population of well over 11 million,… [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 10:50 am
Here's some wisdom on this from John Harrison: Declaratory judgments concerning invalidity may seem like invalidation, but a declaration cannot make a previously valid law invalid, precisely because of its declaratory nature. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 11:21 am
These are petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 5:28 am
Harrison, No. 99-C-4130, 2000 WL 190576, at *12-16 (N.D. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 6:17 am
Punitive damages are additional financial penalties granted in cases in which a jury determines a defendant has behaved recklessly. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 8:54 am
First, Professor John Harrison of Virginia Law explores the history of pardon and the President's "power of doing good without a rule. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 7:11 pm
The court also grants a permanent injunction against granting new DACA applications. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:07 pm
In a recent case, Harrison v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 10:43 am
Brett Harrison—a board-certified criminal law attorney and partner in Bain, Files, Jarrett, Bain & Harrison in Tyler—joins after serving from 2009 to 2011 on the TBLS Criminal Law Exam Commission. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 6:56 am
Harrison, 61 M.J. 70 (C.A.A.F. 2005) (summary disposition) (granting habeas petition to compel United States to comply with the Army Court of Criminal Appeals' holding) [Category 3]Lucero v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:56 am
This is an important flaw in the court's analysis, because it proceeds to consider whether to grant equitable relief without asking about the prerequisites for doing so. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
The district court granted the motion to compel, holding that (1) all of the Green Tree Parties had standing to compel arbitration even though some were not signatories to the arbitration agreement; and (2) the parties had agreed to delegate questions regarding arbitrability to the arbitrator. [read post]
