Search for: "Gray v. District Court" Results 301 - 320 of 964
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2015, 3:26 am
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio issued in a particularly disturbing child pornography case:  U.S. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 7:00 pm by Sme
Colvin (10th Cir., September 24, 2015) (reversing district court affirmation of the ALJ’s denial of social security benefits to Trujillo)  *Vigil v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 7:16 am by John Jascob
The SEC appealed that order to the Eleventh Circuit, but the district court’s latest order still gives the SEC options that include using its in-house courts (Gray Financial Group, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 6:38 am
The district court had answered that question in the negative and dismissed Mr. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
Christopher Meyer looks at the impact of last Term’s decision in Baker Botts v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 5:51 am by Joy Waltemath
The employee’s sole argument for why the court erred in requiring that he show good faith was that the First Circuit case, Wyatt v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 7:20 am by John Jascob
SEC (the judge in Hill recently reached the same conclusion in another case, Gray v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:47 pm by Joy Waltemath
Emphasizing that it was not deciding the operators’ status, the appellate court concluded that because the plaintiffs could hire others to do their jobs and could, and did, sell their jobs to others, there was a triable fact as to whether they were employees or independent contractors (Gray v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 9:36 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
Finally, the court noted that the defendant was legally under “no obligation to advise plaintiff who to sue,” Gray v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 5:47 am
District Court Judge] sentenced Beckmann to 120 months of imprisonment, a lifetime of supervised release, and ordered him to pay $9,000 of restitution.U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 9:35 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 83982 (ED WI, June 29, 2015), a Wisconsin federal district court refused to allow a Block Muslim inmate to add a RLUIPA claim to his complaint because plaintiff only seeks damages that are unavailable under RLUIPA.In Gray v. [read post]