Search for: "Grosse v. Social Security"
Results 301 - 320
of 395
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2011, 1:50 am
As Gross LJ observes, Dr Naik’s explanation that he used the word “terrorist” to support terrorising “anti-social elements” is difficult enough to follow on its own terms, even with time to analyse the written word; this “convoluted explanation” would simply be lost on a “live” audience. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 11:53 pm
On the same day the Court of Appeal (the Master of the Rolls, Gross and Etherton LJJ) refused permission to appeal in the case of Hutcheson v Popdog Ltd. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 11:29 pm
The Support Magistrate properly declined to consider the factors set forth in Family Court Act 413(1)(f), including the child's receipt of Social Security disability benefits. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 8:51 am
The resolution’s demand that “when designing and implementing strategies, policies and measures to address gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law, the specific context of each situation must be taken into account with a view to preventing the recurrence of crises and future violations of human rights, to ensure social cohesion, nation-building, ownership and inclusiveness at the national and local levels and to promote… [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:33 am
" By contrast, if the contribution is voluntary, it is not to be excluded from gross income. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 5:01 am
In Schramm v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 12:45 am
In 1994 in the case of Securicor Guarding Ltd v Rouse the Appellant company had acted unfairly in dismissing a security guard prosecuted (but not convicted?) [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:14 pm
The protection of investors and of the integrity of securities markets was likewise the goal of the 1933 Securities Act and of the 1934 Securities Exchange Act. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
(See Melone v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm
The following is an essay for our symposium on the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act by Ilya Shapiro, senior fellow in constitutional studies at the Cato Institute and editor-in-chief of the Cato Supreme Court Review. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 2:39 am
As I said in my post on the High Court decision, Mr Condliff has diabetes alongside other health problems, as a result of which he developed a gross appetite and began to gorge himself. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am
GOGGINS AND OTHERS v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
In Cart, the appellant had unsuccessfully appealed to the Social Security and Child Support Tribunal (whose jurisdiction has since been taken over by the First-tier Tribunal) against a decision of the Child Support Agency. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:26 am
The cases The appellants in the two English cases had failed in appeals to the social security and child support and the immigration and asylum chambers of the First-tier Tribunal respectively and had been refused permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal by both the First-tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunal. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 5:50 pm
Hutcheson (formerly known as “KGM”) v News Group Newspapers, heard 24 May 2011 (Master of the Rolls, Etherton and Gross LJJ) Caplin v Associated Newspapers Ltd, heard 26 May 2011 (Sharp J) Lord Ashcroft KCMG v Foley & ors, heard 7-8 June 2011 (Eady J) Cook v Telegraph Media Ltd, heard 9 June 2011 (Tugendhat J) [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 11:08 pm
And the “essentially stopped every effort” is a gross exaggeration.[6] Justice Holmes retired in 1930.[7] The Social Security Act was upheld 7–2, and was not challenged on grounds that doctrinally had anything to do with Lochner, though again, modern constitutional law discourse tends to lump all pre-New Deal doctrines limiting government power, state or federal, together.[8] The “Lochner era” Supreme Court upheld “basic zoning… [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:18 am
While the husband estimated that he would receive over $5,000 per month from his pension alone upon retirement, the wife estimated that between Social Security retirement and her own pension, she would receive approximately $1,200 per month upon her retirement. [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:13 am
Cruz Corchado, 119 D.P.R. 8 (1987).III.As a threshold question, the majority of this Special Panel recognizes the compelling State interest in protecting the physical security of the citizens that inhabit Puerto Rico. [read post]
