Search for: "Gunning v. Doe"
Results 301 - 320
of 5,285
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2010, 7:47 am
The ruling prevents the states from passing laws prohibiting people from owning guns, although it leaves the door open for limited exceptions such as preventing convicted felon from owning guns. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 11:36 am
In D.C. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 2:16 pm
Supreme Court decided the case of District of Columbia v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 9:44 pm
DC v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 9:44 pm
DC v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 1:35 pm
The approach outlined here does not undermine Skoien, 614 F.3d at 639-43, or United States v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 10:43 am
Caetano v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 8:39 pm
Defendant who hid a gun on the roof of a garage had no expectation of privacy there. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 11:05 am
If he does not use controlled substances, then § 922(g)(3) imposes no restriction on his possession of guns. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:10 am
In Chwick v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:28 am
So it will be interesting to see what the Fourth Circuit does with this on appeal. [read post]
S.D.Ga.: Defendant was arrested in house by officers at the window with guns telling him to come out
12 Mar 2011, 8:00 am
Brooks v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 7:24 pm
The Yonay v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm
In 2008, in District of Columbia v. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit invalidated an Illinois law barring most people from publicly carrying loaded guns in Moore v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 12:55 pm
State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 9:00 am
But there is an exception to this general rule: the law applies to people “engage[d] in the business” of firearm manufacturing or sale, but it does not apply to Americans who make their own firearms for personal use. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 12:35 pm
In 1968, Terry v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 5:16 pm
But a general ban on speech that seems to promote the use of firearms would be unconstitutional (see the highlighted passage in R.A.V. v. [read post]
