Search for: "HAND v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE" Results 301 - 320 of 2,559
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2017, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
The right of the media to broadcast flows from section 16 of the Constitution, the right to freedom of expression, which in this context goes hand in hand with the principle of open justice – that court proceedings must be conducted in the open. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 3:00 am by INFORRM
This assessment parallels the reasonable-expectation-of-privacy test articulated by Justice Harlan in Katz v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 2:21 pm by Shea Denning
Third, the United States Supreme Court winds up its term, invariably deciding significant criminal law cases the very week of the conference. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 7:18 am by MBettman
Justice Donnell, dissenting opinion On November 21, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 2:53 am by Robbie Stern
Mr Zabolotnyi  gained permission to appeal to the High Court; shortly after, the Hungarian Department of Justice issued an assurance that if surrendered and detained, Mr Zabolotnyi would be “detained in conditions that guarantee at least 3 square metres of personal space”. [read post]
10 May 2018, 10:15 am
United States, the Trump administration’s position would mark the end of privacy in the digital age. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 5:38 am by William S. Dodge
” The exception applies only if the foreign state is designated by the State Department as a “state sponsor of terrorism” (currently, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, and Syria), and the victim is a U.S. national, member of the U.S. armed forces, or employee of the United States or U.S. government contractor. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 12:15 pm
the Department of Justice representing the United States as intervenor has defended the constitutionality of this statute. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 2:30 pm by Jane Chong
” That process unfolds as follows: the Attorney General may (and reliably does) oppose the request for disclosure by filing an affidavit stating that the disclosure “would harm the national security of the United States,” per 50 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:30 am by David S. Kemp
Justice Kennedy also authored the majority opinion in the seminal 2003 case Lawrence v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am by Coleman Saunders
” The brief of the United States, arguing in support of petitioners, criticized the decisions of the circuit court and outlined the position of the United States regarding the expropriation exception. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 1:09 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 4:10 am
This Kat recently had an opportunity revisit the patent decision given by the United States Supreme Court on 20 March in Mayo Collaborative Services v Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
At The Economist, Steven Mazie discusses Tuesday’s oral argument in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:34 am by Michael C. Dorf
(Rehnquist was recused).The contrast with United States v. [read post]