Search for: "HARPER v. HARPER"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,646
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2022, 7:23 am
One of the biggest cases to watch is Moore v. [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 3:42 pm
Harper are two of the nine cases in the December argument session, which begins on Nov. 28. [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 12:16 pm
Georgetown’s Project on State and Local Government recently hosted a discussion of the Moore case and the independent state legislature doctrine. [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 9:55 am
Calendar notice. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 6:04 am
Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion dissenting from the denial of application for stay in Moore v. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 9:18 pm
Harper, a case that has been pitched as a seismic clash between two troubling positions. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm
Hildebrant (in 1916), to Smiley v. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 8:55 am
Nonetheless, Bush v. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 7:32 am
[The middle ground in Moore v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 9:08 am
Harper qbaron Wed, 10/12/2022 - 11:08 Read more about William Baude Offers a Third Position for the Supreme Court to Take in Moore v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 7:25 am
William Baude and Michael McConnell in The Atlantic: In a constitutional republic like ours, legislatures ultimately derive their authority from the people. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 6:00 am
[ABC] * Moore v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 5:20 am
“The Constitutional-State-Legislature Doctrine Is the Answer the Court Is Looking For; In Moore v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 1:19 pm
I’ve had my share of skepticism here at ELB over the legislature’s claims in Moore v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 1:30 pm
In United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
From U.S. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
Harper involves a challenge to the authority of state courts to set aside congressional maps in North Carolina. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:58 am
Plenty of commentary and analysis over Moore v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:39 am
Harper opposing the independent state legislature doctrine. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 5:51 pm
That case, Merrill v. [read post]