Search for: "HOLDER v. BANKS" Results 301 - 320 of 1,480
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
are now going to be just a little more expensive for rights holders to obtain and maintain. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 12:40 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark Earlier this week, media reports circulated that this past spring Google had exposed the private data of thousands of the Google+ social network users and then opted not to disclose the issue, in part because of concerns that doing so would draw regulatory scrutiny and cause reputational damage. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 12:42 am by Pushkar Taimni
The covenants of the said IMOU covered the matters relating to bank accounts and withdrawal power etc. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 2:23 am
| Retromark Volume III: the last six months in trade marks | An IPSOC Q&A with Mr Justice Birss | The EU Commission proposes new whistle-blowing rules: should IP and trade secret holders tremble? [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:40 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Fort Worth Court of Appeals affirms take-nothing judgment entered against credit card issuer in Bank of America, N.A. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 9:55 am by Charles B. Jimerson, Esq.
  The mortgage holder, usually a bank, doesn’t want to take the time to go through the normal property sale process. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:02 pm by Erin F. Fonté and Ferdose al-Taie
By contrast, the Texas Department of Banking issued a supervisory memo on April 03, 2014, establishing that “because cryptocurrency is not money under the Money Services Act, receiving it in exchange for a promise to make it available at a later time or different location is not money transmission. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 12:05 pm by Dennis Crouch
First Internet Bank of Indiana, No. 17-1590 (“Does 35 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 11:38 am by Erwin Chemerinsky
Likewise, he joined Roberts’ 2010 majority opinion in Holder v. [read post]