Search for: "HOME PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL v. US " Results 301 - 320 of 1,663
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2010, 6:24 am by Edith Garwood
 They have stated, “we expect our customers to use our products in [ways] consistent with human rights and the requirements of international humanitarian law. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:09 pm
As best I can tell, the restriction is this one: 16-1 Marijuana at Denver International Airport It shall be unlawful to: … (b) sell, display, or advertise any product bearing the image, likeness, description, or name of Marijuana or Marijuana-themed paraphernalia … 16-2 Exceptions Section 16-1(b) shall not apply to … (a) Publications or other commercial, print media products in which Marijuana or the image, likeness, or description thereof is… [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 4:18 pm
  Part V: The Nature of Responsibility in CSR—Remedy Week 13:  International Soft Law Approaches: the U.N. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 9:00 pm
 But, there does seem to be a lot of potential in using a product like this to save some hard earned cash. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Coming from Greg Bates and Jonathan Rosenfeld, we have two excellent posts on recent developments surrounding DePuy International. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 2:25 am
But in Magmatic Ltd v PMS International Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 181, PMS has won its appeal to the Court of Appeal.RCDs protect any aspect of the appearance of the whole or a part of a product resulting from its lines, contours, colour, shape or texture or the materials of which it is made. [read post]
17 May 2015, 1:08 am
While consumers’ knowledge of the claimant’s indicia may play a part in helping to establishing goodwill (e.g. pre-trading reputation could reduce the length of trading-time needed to establish goodwill: Home Box Office Inc v Channel 5 Home Box Office Ltd [1982] FSR 449], such reputation has not been sufficient on its own to satisfy the first of the three requirements laid out by the Jif Lemon test. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:18 am
International Truck & Engine Corp., 912 So.2d 1101, 1109 (Miss. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 5:15 am
Baxter International, 495 F.3d 753 (7th Cir. 2007)(written by Judge Easterbrook but with Judge Posner on the panel and very involved at oral argument with the confidential witness issue); and Makor Issues & Rights Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am by Eleonora Rosati
The same could also apply to a company registration.Is this a new cause of action for us trade mark lawyers to start waving around? [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 2:17 pm by Amy Howe
The first of those two cases, Impression Products v. [read post]