Search for: "HOPE v. WALKER"
Results 301 - 320
of 427
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2011, 8:21 am
The Supreme Court recently delivered judgment in the case of Patmalniece (FC) v SoS for Work and Pensions. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 5:56 am
Where’s the walkers? [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:26 am
Lord Walker dissents on the issue of justification. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 5:41 pm
Similarly, in Printz v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 1:53 am
From Tuesday 1 to Thursday 3 March 2011, Lords Phillips, Hope and Walker, Lady Hale and Lords Mance, Collins and Clarke will hear Perpetual Trustee Company Limited v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc; and Belmont Park Investments PTY [...] [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 5:45 pm
In Courtroom 1, Lords Hope, Rodger, Walker, Collins, Kerr, Clarke and Dyson will hear Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Tower MCashback LLP 1 from Monday 21 to Tuesday 22 February 2011. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 3:45 am
The criminal case of note, for those plucky souls who practice habeas law, was the decision in Walker v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
As Judge Vaughn Walker's equal protection analysis in Perry v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
Problem areas include what “unaware” means, the exclusion of electronic communications such as emails and the very broad common law definition of “publication” which has not changed since Duke of Brunswick v Hamer (1849) 14 QB 185. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:52 am
The leading case on the issue is the House of Lords judgment in the 2004 case of R v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:53 am
Baroness Hale (with whom Lords Hope and Walker agreed) gave the leading judgment; Lord Rodger gave a concurring judgment, out of deference to the CA; and Lord Brown doubted the result but, in the oddest final paragraph, basically said that he didn’t care enough to dissent (“At the end of the day, however, I do not feel sufficiently strongly as to the proper outcome of the appeal to carry these doubts to the point of dissent. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 12:46 am
The panel consisted of Lords Hope, Saville, Walker, Collins and Clarke. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm
The closeness of the facts to a "bargain" are a factor in the ultimate resolution of the case: see Robert Walker LJ in Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159, [2003] 1 P & CR 8 at [41] ff especially at [45]. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm
The closeness of the facts to a "bargain" are a factor in the ultimate resolution of the case: see Robert Walker LJ in Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159, [2003] 1 P & CR 8 at [41] ff especially at [45]. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm
The closeness of the facts to a "bargain" are a factor in the ultimate resolution of the case: see Robert Walker LJ in Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159, [2003] 1 P & CR 8 at [41] ff especially at [45]. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 2:04 am
The hearing commenced on Wednesday 8 December before Lords Hope, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir [...] [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:58 am
But in June, the Supreme Court in Holder v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:34 am
Two appeals are listed in the Supreme Court this week with R v F and R v M being heard by Lords Hope, Rodger and Walker, Lady Hale and Lord Brown on Monday 6 December. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 11:07 am
Lords Hope, Rodger and Walker, Lady Hale and Lord Brown will consider whether the condition attached to claiming a state pension credit, of the right of [...] [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 8:22 am
Once fierce opponents in Bush v. [read post]
