Search for: "Hague v. United States" Results 301 - 320 of 1,185
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2016, 6:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
 Petitioner’s agreement to allow the children to travel to the United States for a vacation did not constitute consent to their relocation here, and the actions she took to secure their return under the Hague Convention overwhelmingly supported the finding that she did not consent to their permanent residence in the United States. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:49 pm by Joel R. Brandes
In Lyon v Lyon, 2012 WL 1970363 (D.Kan.) petitioner Kevin Lyon filed a Verified Petition for Return of Child to England and Issuance of Show Cause Order seeking the return of his three-year-old son, F.M.S.L., to England under the Hague Convention. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:49 pm by Joel R. Brandes
In Lyon v Lyon, 2012 WL 1970363 (D.Kan.) petitioner Kevin Lyon filed a Verified Petition for Return of Child to England and Issuance of Show Cause Order seeking the return of his three-year-old son, F.M.S.L., to England under the Hague Convention. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 11:10 am
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International LawJean Galbraith, Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law Recent Books on International LawAllen S. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 2:36 am by Mayela Celis
” The amicus brief of the Hague Delegates coincide with this statement of the United States, while the brief of professors Silberman, Spector and Teitz holds the opposite view. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 7:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
Plaintiff filed a motion for attorney’s fees and necessary expenses, requesting $89,310.08 that included court costs, legal fees, and travel costs between Thailand and the United States. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 1:51 pm by Joel R. Brandes
’s habitual residence to the United States, regardless of his ability to enter the United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 5:00 am by Ted Folkman
The State Department has formally opined that the Bankston case was wrongly decided, see United States Department of State Opinion Regarding the Bankston Case and Service By Mail To Japan Under The Hague Service Convention, 30 I.L.M. 260 (1991). [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
I chose the case of the day, Starski v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 9:51 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Significantly, the Court noted that Mali is not a party to the Hague Convention, and the Convention is not in force between the United States and the Philippines. [read post]