Search for: "Hale v. State"
Results 301 - 320
of 973
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2013, 2:12 pm
Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
21 May 2021, 5:54 am
Eddy, and Sabastian V. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 5:17 am
This judgment triggered some further recriminations despite the fact that Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes and Lord Hodge unanimously dismissed Mirza, Iqbal and Ehsan’s appeals. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 9:22 am
Williams v The London Borough of Hackney [2018] UKSC 37 was about the opposite scenario; where a local authority wanted to accommodate but the parents wanted the children back. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:47 pm
The award of attorney fees in favor of the Hales is therefore unwarranted. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 8:27 am
If the dissent is right, all fifty states may hale him into court to answer for it. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 3:25 am
For these reasons the Court said that the Secretary of State would likely need to redraft her guidance, and in particular the provisions for exceptionally disapplying the rule. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am
But at least since legal realist Robert Hale published his Coercion and Distribution in a Supposedly Non-Coercive State in 1923, the question of what constitutes state "intervention" in the market has been contestable. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:43 am
A similar due process analysis governed the case in United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:27 am
He stated that the judgments in Johnson and Eastwood v Magnox Electric plc; Cornwall County Court v McCabe [2004] UKHL 35 both recognised that provisions in the ERA did not supersede an employee’s common law and contractual rights and he allowed the appeal. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 6:55 am
Corp. et al. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:42 am
On Friday 4 November the matter of Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor will be heard in Courtroom 2 by Lady Hale and Lords Brown, Mance, Kerr and Wilson. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm
Even if Minnesota claimed that pollution emitters in North Dakota were harming the state, Minnesota couldn't hale the North Dakota emitters to court. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:42 am
Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 7:20 am
State, 73 Alabama, 366; State v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
James Wolffe QC, now appears in support of the Respondents. 15.16 Lavery QC states that the will of Parliament should not overrule the will of the Irish people and that the triggering of article 50 without their consent would do just that. 15.14 Lavery QC says that Northern Ireland has a complex constitutional settlement that is legally binding as a result of section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. 15.10 Lavery QC says that section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act… [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:48 am
Lady Hale gave a concurring judgment in which she agreed with Lord Sumption that, given the need for a practicable and proportionate scheme, bright-line rules are necessary, and that the categories used are proportionate, save as to the two exceptions Lord Sumption identified. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 1:01 pm
” State v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 4:57 am
Lady Hale supported Lord Kerr’s analysis. [read post]
