Search for: "Hamburg v. Hamburg" Results 301 - 320 of 617
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2015, 12:00 am by Giesela Ruehl
Abstammung und ordre public im Spiegel des Verfassungs-, Völker- und Europarechts”). [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:25 am
 The title -- "IP in 2015 - Where we are v Where I thought we'd be"  -- is broad enough to suit all tastes and a multiplicity of interpretations. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:33 am by Bill Marler
COLI O157:H7 BACTERIA Sources, Characteristics, and Identification E. coli O157:H7 is one of hundreds of strains of the bacterium Escherichia coli.[1] Most strains of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and animals.[2] The E. coli bacterium is among the most extensively studied microorganism.[3] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific markers found on its surface and distinguishes it from other… [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 4:12 pm by Lou M
But the Court's latest pronouncement on Title VII religious accommodation in the EEOC v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 3:30 am by William Funk
In March, Justice Thomas cited it extensively in his concurrence in Department of Transportation v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 7:50 am
The term “power of judicial review” was not used in Marbury v. [read post]
17 May 2015, 2:57 am by Matthias Weller
Siehr recalled the landmark cases of Attorney-General of New Zealand v Ortiz, [1984] AC 1, Winkworth v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 8:35 am by Alexandra Allan
It was intended to cover a situation where the first sentence was ineffective, for example due to the application of the Hamburg Rules, and proceedings were commenced in another jurisdiction. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 6:49 am by Daniel E. Katz
In Platek v Town of Hamburg, 2015 NY Slip Op 01483 (Feb. 19, 2015), the plaintiffs’ home was damaged after a subsurface water main pipe abutting their property ruptured, causing water to flood into their finished basement. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 6:35 am by Bill Marler
In particular, the court case (Supreme Beef v USDA) limited the ability of USDA to enforce its regulations, effectively barring the government from shutting down a plant which fails to meet safety standards for Salmonella. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 6:24 am by Bill Marler
In particular, the court case (Supreme Beef v USDA) limited the ability of USDA to enforce its regulations, effectively barring the government from shutting down a plant which fails to meet safety standards for Salmonella. [read post]