Search for: "Hand v. Board of Education"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,507
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
In Defence of the Triple Test: A Case for Retaining the Standard in Bangalore Water Supply (Part-II)
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
On one hand, he described sovereign functions of the State as 'the primary and inalienable functions of a constitutional government'. [read post]
In Defence of the Triple Test: A Case for Retaining the Standard in Bangalore Water Supply (Part-II)
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
On one hand, he described sovereign functions of the State as 'the primary and inalienable functions of a constitutional government'. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 11:04 am
Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board, No. 113721 et seq. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 2:47 pm
Board of Education, 333 U.S. 203 (1948) (quoting Thomas Jefferson’s Letter to the Danbury Baptist Association dated Jan. 1, 1802); Reynolds v. [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 8:27 am
Educ. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
ATTORNEY’S FEES ■Jose Parra, Applicant v. [read post]
1 May 2011, 7:52 am
Solis v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 6:39 am
Board of Education that public employees have the right to speak out on matters of public concern without retaliation (unless their speech disrupts the workplace). [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 6:00 am
Under a long line of cases (including NFIB v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:46 pm
From Young v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 2:45 am
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board has scheduled eight (8) oral hearings for the month of February 2020. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:07 am
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board has scheduled seven (7) hearings for the month of February, as listed below. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
Board of Education was before the Court, and wrote a memorandum recommending that the Court adhere to Plessy v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 12:30 pm
Davison v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 9:07 am
Itawamba County School Board * Racy Teen Photos Posted to Facebook Are Constitutionally Protected Speech–TV v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:45 am
In Holt v Board of Education, 52 NY2d 625, the Court of Appeals decided that performance evaluations and letters of criticism placed in the employee’s personnel file were not “disciplinary penalties” and thus could be placed there without having to first hold a disciplinary proceeding. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:48 am
The legal distinction between domicile and residence Maksym v Board of Election Commissioners, appeal from 2010 COEL 020, #1-1-0033Rahm Emanuel’s claim that he is eligible to run for the office of Mayor for the City of Chicago will be considered by the Illinois State Supreme Court shortly. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:57 pm
As noted by the IPKat earlier today, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the case this morning. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
The Court, referring to its 2007 Grand Chamber judgment in Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. [read post]
