Search for: "Hand v. Rhodes"
Results 301 - 320
of 333
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2008, 9:25 pm
The thoughtful panel decision in US v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 1:12 am
In a noteworthy Clean Air Act decision in the wake of Massachusetts v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 6:10 pm
Rhodes v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 1:58 pm
In Carcieri v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 1:50 am
C.M. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 8:04 pm
The First Circuit's opinion, Rhode Island asserted, clashes with decisions from the Second and Ninth Circuits as well as Sherrill v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 2:21 am
In July of 2007, I was the attorney for the defendant in the divorce of Sullivan v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 5:00 am
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 2.0) 1. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 11:05 am
From the Southern District of West Virginia comes Rhodes v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 10:00 am
That type of distinction was adopted by the Rhode Island Supreme Court in State of Rhode Island v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 7:30 pm
In the first few days of same-sex marriage, marriage licenses were issued to non-residents, and have resulted in decisions such as Chambers v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
State of Rhode Island v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 6:25 pm
The Rhode Island Supreme Court faced an analogous question, at least as it construed the issue before it, in its recent ruling in Chambers v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 11:15 am
See Rhode Island v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 5:27 pm
Moreover, not only must the Attorney General have absolute control over all stages of the litigation, but he or she must also appear to the citizenry of Rhode Island and to the world at large to be exercising such control.State of Rhode Island v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 6:58 pm
In Chambers v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
As a result of that, and some litigation in the Massachusetts state courts, it seems that the only U.S. residents who have been allowed to marry in Massachusetts are Rhode Islanders (based on a possibly dubious interpretation of Rhode Island law by the Massachusetts courts) and a few New Yorkers who rushed in to marry in 2004 before state government threats to local clerks shut down that process. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 1:34 pm
The more this argument is used, the more likely it will be respected in the future by judges based upon the Rhode Island Supreme Court ruling in Waters v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 3:00 am
Likewise, the Supreme Court of Rhode Island in Pulawski v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 1:04 pm
[The Rhode Island Supreme Court case cited in the briefs is State of Rhode Island v. [read post]
