Search for: "Harding v. Industrial Commission" Results 301 - 320 of 709
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2022, 3:10 am by Florian Mueller
Not long after I finished reading, I felt eerily reminded of another antitrust complaint involving games, platforms (iOS), and even the subscription model (Apple Arcade): Pistacchio v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 10:17 pm
The Supreme Court held 5 to 4 today in Altria Group, Inc, v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 3:05 am by Broc Romanek
The staff observed that, although there are some prescriptive and structured elements, the current requirements are largely principles-based, with disclosure determined on the basis of “materiality” as defined in TSC Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 3:05 am by Broc Romanek
The staff observed that, although there are some prescriptive and structured elements, the current requirements are largely principles-based, with disclosure determined on the basis of “materiality” as defined in TSC Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 3:00 am by Steve Lombardi
A case on point from the Iowa Industrial Commission is McHargue vs Fountain West Health Center, File No. 5008594 (worker lost) and then compare the result to (benefits not awarded). [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 10:07 am by Phil Dixon
The state definition of marijuana in G.S. 90-87(16) excludes “industrial hemp as defined in G.S. 106-568.51, when the industrial hemp is produced and used in compliance with the rules issued by the North Carolina Industrial Hemp Commission”. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 7:04 am by John Elwood
For sheer headline grabbery, it’s hard to beat Klein v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 4:26 pm by laurahess
Werdegar, the court explained that neither state statutes nor the orders of the Industrial Welfare Commission (IWC) compel an employer to ensure employees cease all work during meal periods. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 6:59 am by Florian Mueller
But even a somewhat permissive stance would make it very hard for Motorola to get away with theories based on very different industry standards, or with a refusal to apply the Entire Market Value Rule. [read post]