Search for: "Harmon v. Givens"
Results 301 - 320
of 517
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2024, 7:04 am
In the Optis v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 12:35 pm
POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 9:30 pm
In Mullenix v. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 10:29 am
He went on to say: In particular, I do not agree that the majority's analysis of the pilots' alleged authority to assign and to responsibly direct other employees, or of the pilots' alleged exercise of independent judgment, is necessarily the proper way to harmonize the result in this case with the concerns express by the Supreme Court in NLRB v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm
Given the uncertainty, three vehicles were invoked by the same party to get into the court of appeals for a second opinion: (1) Notice of regular appeal, should the order compelling multi-party arbitration be deemed final; (2) notice of interlocutory (accelerated) appeal otherwise; and (3) petition for mandamus, in case appellate jurisdiction was found to be lacking. [read post]
10 May 2019, 12:59 pm
Co. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 12:12 pm
The program of harmonization and unification of conflicts of laws (“Rome I”–“Rome V” and more) obliges to describe the scope of each regulation. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Supreme Court’s statement in Reiter v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:58 am
INS v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 7:31 am
No case law supports such a contention. __ Given a seeming split in Washington courts, this case is a possible candidate for review by the Washington State Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 4:43 am
(2) Should our national and international law making force further EU harmonization over and beyond what has already occurred? [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:17 am
Harmon, 54 F.4th 839 (Dec. 13, 2022). [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 10:47 am
This included a brief from 17 leading economists [PDF] in the case of Eldred v Ashcroft, which was an (ultimately unsuccessful) legal challenge to the U.S. copyright term extension law. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 3:47 am
As such, it must (unsurprisingly) be interpreted in the light of its usual meaning and the context in which it is generally used.Agreeing with the AG, the Court further observed that:that concept refers, in its usual sense, to the fundamental moral values and standards to which a society adheres at a given time. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 10:47 am
This included a brief from 17 leading economists [PDF] in the case of Eldred v Ashcroft, which was an (ultimately unsuccessful) legal challenge to the U.S. copyright term extension law. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 8:07 am
The author of a critical edition is required to ‘reconstruct’ the meaning of the text and convey the original message, given that such text is likely to be missing ‘pieces’.Translated into copyright language: a critical edition is an example of derivative work.Despite (or rather because of?) [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 1:56 pm
Pusateri v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 11:40 am
., Green Smart v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 10:47 am
Given their lack of harmonization, when collective redress mechanisms with different levels of representation are used, the application of the rules on parallel actions can cause procedural chaos. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am
The Court found that the then Home Secretary Suella Braverman passed the anti-protest measures in June 2023 despite having not been given the power by Parliament to do so [100]. [read post]
