Search for: "Harms v. United States of America" Results 301 - 320 of 1,517
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2019, 5:28 pm by Otieno B. Ombok
In the latest iteration of the case, the judge, over the objection of WashTech and the government, also allowed several groups to intervene, including the National Association of Manufacturers, the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, and the Information Technology Industry Council. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:30 am
Background Hope was the Executive Vice President of Sales for DLO, responsible for the company's sales of iPod accessories throughout the United States and Canada. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
United of Omaha Life Insurance Co., 430 F. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am by Josh Blackman
The “presumption of regularity” that attaches to all federal officials’ actions, United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am by Justin Cole
” Brief that makes this argument: The United States, filed in support of vacatur. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:30 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) In a recently-filed amicus brief submitted by Oracle America Inc. before the en banc Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:19 pm by Amy Howe
The government’s recommendation in Bank of America v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am by SteinMcewen, LLP
“New” Defense: Prior Commercial Use The United States has not traditionally had an express prior user defense or experimental user defense, but such defenses have effectively always been present. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
Gray goods, or parallel imports of genuine goods, refer to a fact pattern in which someone other that the designated exclusive United States importer buys genuine trademarked goods outside the United States and imports them for sale into the United States in competition with the exclusive United States importer.[4] While the terms, "gray goods" and "parallel imports," are often used… [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 12:16 pm by Marie-Andree Weiss
Not surprisingly, the US government had concerns when signing the Convention in 1994, declaring then that “nothing in the Convention shall be deemed to require or to authorize legislation or other action by the United States of America incompatible with the provisions of the Constitution of the United States of America. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 12:16 pm by Marie-Andree Weiss
Not surprisingly, the US government had concerns when signing the Convention in 1994, declaring then that “nothing in the Convention shall be deemed to require or to authorize legislation or other action by the United States of America incompatible with the provisions of the Constitution of the United States of America. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
 That is the case, now usually called United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 1:45 pm by lcampbell@lawbc.com
Backstrom On October 13, 2017, Petitioners League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), et al. filed a motion to expedite briefing and hearing in League of United Latin American Citizens v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:48 am by Peter Margulies
Immigrants from Central America may also want to reunite with family members already in the United States. [read post]