Search for: "Harrington v. Harrington"
Results 301 - 320
of 657
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2017, 9:51 am
All sides faced sharp questioning from many corners of the Supreme Court on Monday in Town of Chester v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 6:54 am
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard argument in Fowler v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 5:36 pm
In Czyzewski v. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 10:00 am
Harrington v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:29 am
Last month the Supreme Court of Mississippi handed down its 6-3 split opinion in the matter of Harrington v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 7:05 am
The case is Virgie Arthur v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:56 pm
The case is Lee Oskar Levitin, et al. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:57 pm
She did so in the context of allowing a husband leave when his solicitors twice made miscalculations.Her Honour stated:Reference was made to Clivery & Conway [2010] FamCA 1435 and the well known principles referable to such leave applications were discussed:The principles emerging from Gallo v Dawson may be summarised as follows: The grant of an extension of time is not automatic.The object is to ensure that Rules which fix times do not become instruments of injustice.Since the… [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am
By virtue of Section 32DA of the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 :-(i) “In an Act, a reference to a de facto partner is a reference to either one of two persons who are living together as a couple on a genuine domestic basis who are not married to each other or related by family;(v) For sub-section (1) – (a) the gender of the persons is not relevant…. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 8:27 pm
Moore & Harrington v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:05 pm
However, he actually elected to follow the same line of reasoning as DJ Goodwins in Woods v Harrington (reported by us here) and held that protection after the end of the tenancy was not acceptable. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 11:08 pm
Shepley v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:05 pm
However, he actually elected to follow the same line of reasoning as DJ Goodwins in Woods v Harrington (reported by us here) and held that protection after the end of the tenancy was not acceptable. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 3:19 am
(emphasis added)Stephen Page, Harrington Family Lawyers, Brisbane spage@harringtonfamilylawyers.com 61(7) 3221 9544 [read post]
27 Jul 2006, 7:25 am
V. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 4:22 pm
In the 1963 case Brady v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 11:41 am
Humphries, 09–350 (relisted on 1/8/10, 1/15, and, apparently, 1/22), and Harrington v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
… Stereo Decisis PodcastJoshua Sealy-Harrington on Jury Selection, Diversity and Equality On this episode of the podcast, Hilary Young and Robert Danay are joined by constitutional litigator and self-styled “Blackademic,” Joshua Sealy-Harrington. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 6:03 am
On Jan. 28 and 29, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 6:35 am
V. 240/242 Franklin Avenue, L.L.C., just decided by the Appellate Division. [read post]