Search for: "Harris v. Clerk of Court"
Results 301 - 320
of 488
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2010, 8:06 pm
Justice Stevens had a similar epiphany in the case of Baze v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
One of the most contentious cases of the Supreme Court’s term has been Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 11:42 am
And: The United States Supreme Court is about to decide a case called Connick v. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 8:07 am
Maynard, later reviewed by the Supreme Court under the name United States v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:01 pm
In particular, the Kentucky case, Kant v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 12:57 pm
The Supreme Court was unusually transparent in its explanation for the late recusal, with Clerk of the Court Scott Harris telling the parties, in a letter released by the court, that “the ordinary conflict check conducted in Justice Kennedy’s chambers inadvertently failed to find this conflict. [read post]
22 May 2008, 7:32 am
But Harris v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
But the Court took longer than usual to announce grants after the Long Conference, suggesting that the law clerks fit the final quality control check into the few days before the announcement. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
This is a plausible understanding of “substantial obstacle,” particularly given the Supreme Court precedents that have followed Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 8:11 am
(For seven months, he tried to move the deciding justices on Dobbs v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:47 pm
Kenyon, Clerk Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District of the State of Idaho, in and for Ada County. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
In today’s column, I analyze the Supreme Court oral argument held a few weeks ago in Walker v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 11:23 am
Supreme Court in Penry v. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 4:35 pm
Rita Braver of CBS News referenced Blackmun’s support for abortion rights and Roe v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 1:08 pm
Supreme Court in Atkins v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 7:08 am
The rare winner of a relist-free grant is Harris v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
In the space below, we offer some unconventional thoughts about the highly-anticipated Sebelius v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:30 pm
But pay special attention to Footnote 3 which solidifies suspicions that today's circuit court clerks take Harry Potter as their cultural polestar and not a 1960s sitcom that made bank in syndication while its actors were left at sea. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 1:45 pm
High court debates a little case with lots of laughter [CNN / Political Ticker] Barber v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:49 am
The title must begin with the words "Harry Potter and the ... [read post]
