Search for: "Harts v. State"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,039
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2009, 5:41 pm
Either way, it appears affordable housing or inclusionary zoning ordinances are under siege in this state (see our blog article on Building Industry Association of Central California v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 11:09 am
Nieto v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:48 pm
Finally, both of these positions are exemplified in the case: Judge Hart (sitting by designation from the Northern District of Illinois) writes the majority opinion and reverses the trial court's dismissal of the complaint, and Judge Kleinfeld pens a dissent on this point. [read post]
14 May 2018, 4:30 am
Hart’s general concept of law. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 7:31 am
Phelps and United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 9:57 am
Facts: This case (United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 1:31 pm
" Hart's article appeared shortly after the U.S. [read post]
20 May 2011, 4:30 am
The Ninth Circuit also maintained that each of the circuit court addressed this issue --Hart v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:00 pm
The state has a list of all registered voters. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:12 am
At Casetext, Terry Hart analyzes last week’s ruling in in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
“In Sackett v EPA, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that EPA had overstepped its authority,” said NCBA Chief Counsel Mary Thomas Hart. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:43 am
Hart and William W. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 11:19 pm
Hart U.S. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 5:39 am
Kendrick v. [read post]
20 Aug 2016, 5:53 am
This is illustrated in a case from the Texas Southern District styled, Sarmiento v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 2:09 am
It is axiomatic that counsel "may not shift to the client the legal responsibility it was specifically hired to undertake because of its superior knowledge" (Hart v Carro, Spanbock, Kaster & Cuiffo, 211 AD2d 617, 619 [1995]). [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 6:30 am
Hart, 602 F. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 8:28 am
Hart v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 4:24 pm
Faced with persistent unemployment, a nationwide foreclosure crisis, deep cuts to state and local budgets, and declining state support for public education, Americans are questioning the promise of upward mobility. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 3:02 am
Nevertheless, the court held that what the Hartes experienced qualified as unreasonable search and seizure – and also let them continue with their state-law claims – so Harte v. [read post]