Search for: "He, et al v. Holder" Results 301 - 320 of 412
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2010, 4:46 pm
American Express Co., et al., No. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 8:04 am by The Health Law Firm
Holder, JR., et al., No. 12-5072 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 12:55 pm by Padraic F.X. Dugan, Esq.
Koziol-McLain, et al., “Risk Factors For Femicide Within Physically Abusive Intimate Relationships: Results From a Multi-site Case Control Study,” 93 Amer. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:51 pm
[ii] For a detailed discussion on how the term ‘control’ has been defined under other statutes and regulations of India, See Sandip Bhagat et al., India: Defining Control, International Financial Law Review (IFLR), June 10, 2010. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:38 am by Matthew David Brozik
(Judge Denny Chin dissented, but he was outnumbered two to one.) [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 7:05 am by admin
In Canada Permanent Trust Co. et al. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Before he died in 1845, Joseph Story published another twenty-one books after his Commentaries. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 6:45 pm
Merrill et al., Eds., A Patent System for the 21st Century (National Research Council, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2004), pp. 25-27.What Merrill et al. said on pages 25-27 is a bit different. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 8:04 am by Erin Miller
Opinion below (2d Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition of the United States Brief in opposition of respondents Thompson et al. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Government is not a party to this defamation lawsuit—Victor Restis et al. v. [read post]