Search for: "Hernandez v. People"
Results 301 - 320
of 362
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Case style: Neese v. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 12:43 pm
Rose v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 5:13 am
Sergio Hernandez, Sean O’Key, Amanda Watts, Byron Manley and Henrik Pettersson report for CNN. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 1:39 pm
” The majority cited the Supreme Court’s 2003 opinion in Raytheon Co v Hernandez in support. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, January 17, 2008 US v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am
For people on both sides of the class action bar, denial in these two cases represents a big missed opportunity to provide additional clarity on recurring issues. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 4:16 am
Sergio Hernandez, Sean O’Key, Amanda Watts, Byron Manley and Henrik Pettersson report for CNN. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:31 am
This is according to a statement made by the press service of Yevgeny V. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 4:49 am
Sergio Hernandez, Sean O’Key, Amanda Watts, Byron Manley and Henrik Pettersson report for CNN. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm
“ Rodrigo Hernandez v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Hernandez, No. 07-1828 In a matter of first impression concerning the application of section 4A1.1(d) of the federal sentencing guideline, sentence for conspiracy to distribute heroin is affirmed where: 1) defendant "committed the instant offense while under a[] criminal justice sentence"; and 2) the district court appropriately elevated his criminal history score by two points on that account. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:35 am
In cases such as Hernandez v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
See also, e.g., Hernandez v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 3:45 am
Google and Twitter v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
The leading case is Kemp v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 8:39 am
In a cross-border shooting case, Hernandez et al. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:58 am
., LP v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 12:44 pm
’” Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:54 am
Her public employer did not need for her testimony to be actually impeached at a hearing in order to show that her comments created a substantial disruption in the workplace (Shepherd v McGee, November 7, 2013, Hernandez, M). [read post]
