Search for: "Hill v. Texas Government"
Results 301 - 320
of 392
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am
Last week, the Court issued a per curiam opinion in the Texas redistricting case, Perry v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am
Last week, the Court issued a per curiam opinion in the Texas redistricting case, Perry v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:31 am
At The Hill, Ronald Goldfarb proposes a solution to the Court’s disputed recusal policy: the Court could “adopt[] a rule of its own, based on prevailing ethical standards, and assign[] the administration and governance of recusal motions to a panel . . . of federal judges. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:22 pm
In addition, United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:22 pm
In addition, United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:46 am
” The Kaiser Health News Blog and The Hill report on comments by administration officials on the federal government’s filing. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:02 pm
The three cases under review are Perry v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 7:10 am
At The Hill’s Healthwatch blog (h/t Howard Bashman), Sam Baker examines a possible weakness in the government’s position defending the individual mandate: If Congress has the power to enforce the insurance mandate, where does that power stop? [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 6:57 am
Briefly: In Forbes, Kashmir Hill discusses a recent decision by a federal magistrate judge who declined to wait for the Court to issue its decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:35 am
Thompson and Smith v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm
Jason Jordan, University of North Texas: De Jure Blackness: Racialization in Brown v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 6:26 am
Louie, the Court has asked the federal government to weigh in on the constitutionality of Hawaiian laws providing tax exemptions for those classified as “native peoples,” while the issue in Decker v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 10:02 am
On the Hill, Congress is busy trying to jam through bad bills while they hope no one is looking. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:04 am
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 10:45 am
United States, 11-5323, another in the group of petitions discussed last week that the Court is collecting for the November 22 Conference along with Hill v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:13 pm
The government’s brief in Hill agrees that the Court should grant cert. in the case. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
Int’l L. 165-197 (2009).Hill, Michael. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
Dukes, and Turner v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 7:30 am
Healthwatch, The Hill’s health care blog, summarizes the federal government’s arguments, made in response to the petitions filed by the group of states and the NFIB, about whether the Act’s individual mandate can be struck down without affecting other provisions of the law. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:47 pm
Opinion issued October 13, 2011 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-11-00562-CV ——————————— SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, Appellant V. [read post]
