Search for: "Holm v. Holm" Results 301 - 320 of 1,851
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2014, 9:05 pm by Gordon Firemark
In this Episode: In this Episode: 1 Update on Smokey Robinson – declaratory judgment action 2 Update on Sherlock Holmes copyright 3 Update on EU Right to be Forgotten 4 Second Circuit Rules that HathiTrust Digitizing Libraries is Fair Use 5 Blizzard sues Starcraft II Hackers for copyright infringement 6 Magic Trading Card Suit 7 Videogame Composer Blasts Musicians Union for Rule-Violation Charges Amid Contract Strife 8 First Circuit Application v Registration with copyright… [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 9:29 am by Lindsay Griffiths
Supreme Court submissions to be available to the public (10.10.2013) from Holmes O'Malley Sexton: Holmes O'Malley reports on a significant development in Supreme Court procedure in Ireland. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 8:16 am
It is no stretch to say that Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes created the modern First Amendment a hundred years ago in his dissent in Schenck v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 8:16 am by Christine Corcos
It is no stretch to say that Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes created the modern First Amendment a hundred years ago in his dissent in Schenck v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 6:39 am
The Court did grant leave to file a bill of complaint in Florida v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 8:10 am by Mark Tushnet
One thing that Hogan did as ABA President was to name a Committee on the Bill of Rights, which filed an important amicus brief on behalf of the CIO in Hague v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 2:54 pm by David Kopel
The opinion was written by McReynolds, and joined by the progressive Justices Brandeis and Holmes, along with the rest of the Court. [read post]
31 May 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Delaware marks 70th anniversary of its role in landmark Brown v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 6:49 am by Jeff Gamso
Holmes probably believed what he wrote in Abrams, just as he believed what her wrote in Schenck v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 7:18 am by Laura E. Phillips and Thomas Ince
In the recent case of Holmes v Qinetiq Ltd, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (“EAT”) considered for the first time whether the power to increase or decrease an award of compensation for a failure to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice extends to dismissals on the grounds of ill health. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 4:18 pm
An interesting situation, if perhaps an increasingly common one, has just been set out in the Court of Appeal case of Holmes-Moorhouse v London Borough of Richmond-Upon-Thames [2007] EWCA Civ 970. [read post]