Search for: "Holmes v. Holmes"
Results 301 - 320
of 2,138
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2020, 8:33 am
See: Seattle Times v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 5:23 am
McPherson v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 3:46 am
Corp. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 12:41 pm
If you want a precedent about the state forcibly performing medical procedures on people to promote the common good, look to Justice Holmes's opinion in Buck v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 6:42 am
Criminal procedure — Voir dire — Kazadi v. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 8:08 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 6:00 pm
[Jacobson v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 10:45 pm
In Buck v. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 12:51 pm
Farley (which I had also filed) and Holmes v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm
In Artis v. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 12:28 pm
[There would be an interpretive question about Bolling v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 2:43 pm
JUDGE BARRETT: Justice Holmes' famous dissent in Lochner, which was later the position adopted by the Court [in Williamson v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 12:09 pm
Are the character traits of Sherlock Holmes protected by intellectual property? [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:57 am
Although the courts have acknowledged in Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate that Sherlock Holmes as a character is protectable (within the relevant term), the extent of "roundedness" that could extend outside of the term is very debatable. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:57 am
Although the courts have acknowledged in Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate that Sherlock Holmes as a character is protectable (within the relevant term), the extent of "roundedness" that could extend outside of the term is very debatable. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:57 am
Although the courts have acknowledged in Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate that Sherlock Holmes as a character is protectable (within the relevant term), the extent of "roundedness" that could extend outside of the term is very debatable. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:57 am
Although the courts have acknowledged in Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate that Sherlock Holmes as a character is protectable (within the relevant term), the extent of "roundedness" that could extend outside of the term is very debatable. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 6:14 am
” The majority also rejected the dissenting judge’s view that Holmes v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 10:06 am
In Buck v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 5:11 am
Previous decisions (both against the Conan Doyle Estate) in Conan Doyle v London Mystery Magazine and Tyburn Productions Ltd v Conan Doyle [1991] Ch. 75 CA have held that the Sherlock Holmes’ name and address and the literary characters themselves are not protectable under UK law. [read post]
