Search for: "Hopkins v. State" Results 301 - 320 of 804
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2018, 9:58 am by Jon Penney
  Is there any evidence that over the 12 years, during the flowering of the so-called surveillance state, Americans have become less politically active? [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Monroe v Hopkins[2017] EWHC 433 (QB) (England) Defamation claims arising from social media platforms featured in 2017, the most prominent perhaps being that of food writer Jack Monroe against journalist Katie Hopkins. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
On 5 January 2018 permission was refused in the case of Monroe v Hopkins and on 9 January 2018 permission was refused in Guise v Shah. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Lisle-Mainwaring v Associated Newspapers (referred to a judge, 27 October 2017) [pdf] AlSaifi v Trinity Mirror PLC and Board of Directors and Anr Butt v The Secretary of State for the Home Department The Queen on the application of The News Media Association v The Press Recognition Panel and Anr ABC (A Mother) v The Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The trials were as follows: Monroe v Hopkins [2017] EWHC 433 (QB)(Warby J). [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
 The Pennsylvania Supreme Court noted that this was an issue of first impression in its Court.The Bristol decision reverses the Pennsylvania Superior Court's previous ruling in Hopkins v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 2:35 am by INFORRM
 We have had over 400,000 page views this year, more than half from the UK with the United States, Australia, Malaysia and India making up the rest of the top five. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
It has also been announced that the Mail Online has paid substantial damages to teacher Jackie Teale after a Katie Hopkins’ column wrongly stated that she had taken her class to a protest against Donald Trump. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
He could live where he liked and as he liked… The sensible, law-abiding Englishman distrusted the state. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 12:27 am by David Cheifetz
If you have nothing better to do, read a 2003 ONCA decision not mentioned in the Sacks reasons which set out Ontario law as it was in 2003 when Athey material contribution to injury ruled the realm and, in Ontario, was known as “contributory causation”: Mizzi v Hopkins, 2003 CanLII 52145 (ON CA). [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 6:06 am by Naomi Shatz
In one of the leading cases on this topic, Jespersen v. [read post]