Search for: "Housing Authority v. City Council" Results 301 - 320 of 997
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm by NL
It includes also those situations where, in general terms, a housing authority must act "fairly and reasonably" in administering its responsibilities: see, for example, Sheffield City Council v Smart (2002) HLR 34. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm by NL
It includes also those situations where, in general terms, a housing authority must act "fairly and reasonably" in administering its responsibilities: see, for example, Sheffield City Council v Smart (2002) HLR 34. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 9:32 am by Giles Peaker
Following Codona v Mid-Bedfordshire District Council (2005) HLR 1, the Circuit Judge found that it was. [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:36 pm
L also removed herself from the Leeds City Council priority housing list. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 5:54 am by NL
Ravichandran & Anor v London Borough of Lewisham [2010] EWCA Civ 755 Or Omar v Birmingham City Council [2007] EWCA Civ 610 revisted. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 5:54 am by NL
Ravichandran & Anor v London Borough of Lewisham [2010] EWCA Civ 755 Or Omar v Birmingham City Council [2007] EWCA Civ 610 revisted. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 11:13 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
There may well be a problem in inner city areas, given benefit caps v. market rents and shortage of accommodation, but big cities are only a small part of Britain. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 3:27 pm by Giles Peaker
Cases like Birmingham City Council v Balog [2013] EWCA Civ 1582 show that this is not necessary. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 3:27 pm by Giles Peaker
Cases like Birmingham City Council v Balog [2013] EWCA Civ 1582 show that this is not necessary. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 11:08 am by Jonathan Nirenberg
The New York City Housing Authority, the primary issue in harassment cases under the NYC HRL is whether the employee can prove that the employer treated him or her worse than other employees because he or she is a member of a legally protected category. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 12:44 pm by Giles Peaker
The Supreme Court decision in Samuels v Birmingham City Council (2019) UKSC 28 (our note) on affordability was also taken to apply to suitability, not just intentionality. [read post]
16 Apr 2016, 5:39 pm by Patricia Salkin
The Center for Powell Crossing, LLC v City of Powell, 2016 WL 1165355 (SD OH 3/25/2016)Filed under: Comprehensive Plan, Current Caselaw, Due Process, Takings [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:46 am by CAJ
  Although it was accepted that there had been detailed consideration of proportionality in Burnip v Birmingham City Council [2012] EWCA Civ 269 (which concerned an appeal from the Upper Tribunal), it was noted that there had not been any discussion in that case as to the respective roles of the Upper Tribunal and the Court of Appeal. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:46 am by CAJ
  Although it was accepted that there had been detailed consideration of proportionality in Burnip v Birmingham City Council [2012] EWCA Civ 269 (which concerned an appeal from the Upper Tribunal), it was noted that there had not been any discussion in that case as to the respective roles of the Upper Tribunal and the Court of Appeal. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 7:32 am by William Consovoy
City of Jackson, this is precisely the kind of statutory language Congress uses to prohibit disparate treatment. [read post]