Search for: "Howard v. United States" Results 301 - 320 of 1,371
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
United States, ex rel. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
As the Supreme Court has stated, "[a] criminal act committed wholly within a State 'cannot be made an offence against the United States, unless it have some relation to the execution of a power of Congress, or to some matter within the jurisdiction of the United States.'" Bond, 572 U.S. at 854. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
As the Supreme Court has stated, "[a] criminal act committed wholly within a State 'cannot be made an offence against the United States, unless it have some relation to the execution of a power of Congress, or to some matter within the jurisdiction of the United States.'" Bond, 572 U.S. at 854. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 9:30 pm by David B. Kopel
The Australia program is often touted as a model for the United States. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 12:44 pm by Scott Bomboy
And in 1926, Supreme Court Chief Justice William Howard Taft said in Myers v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 4:19 pm by Ilya Somin
The expert near-consensus on this subject is backed by longstanding Supreme Court precedent, going back to United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 10:05 pm by Anthony Gaughan
Keith of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices will consider whether a provision of the federal sex-offender act violates the nondelegation doctrine. [read post]
The conclusion that the President of the United States took part in a criminal conspiracy became inescapable. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 1:20 pm
At the time of the bench trial, Via Varejo had pending applications for three Casas Bahia service marks in the United States. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 1:05 pm
See Bulova Watch, 344 U.S. at 281 (“The issue is whether a United States District Court has jurisdiction to award relief to an American corporation against acts of trademark infringement and unfair competition consummated in a foreign country by a citizen and resident of the United States. [read post]