Search for: "Howes v. Secretary, Department of Corrections" Results 301 - 320 of 526
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2017, 4:59 am by Jane Chong
Yesterday afternoon, the Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc, heard two hours of argument in IRAP v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Here, for instance, is a letter that led the court in Correctional Medical Care, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 10:21 am by Emma Boffey and Lorraine Walkinshaw
The appeals On this occasion, the three cases, to be heard over the four days, are all Scottish appeals: Monday 12 June, 11am – 4pmSadovska and another v Secretary of State for the Home Department This appeal relates to the evidential burden on the state when disrupting ‘sham marriages’. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm by Josh Blackman
This final part will analyze how the new order fares under the Establishment Clause. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:56 pm by Josh Blackman
If the State Department issues the mother-in-law a visa, promptly, this plaintiff’s claim becomes moot and should be dismissed. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
The Daily Express has corrected an article claiming that 900 migrants carried out sex attacks in Frankfurt on New Year’s Eve. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Benjamin Wittes, Quinta Jurecic
Yet, for a variety of reasons we discuss below, there is something different about the questions about Trump’s oath, and it is how widespread and mainstream the anxiety is. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
This is particularly so given the Supreme Court’s holding in 1989 in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 10:23 am by Jordan Brunner
The move presents a crucial test of Trump’s vow to improve relations with Russia, at a time when key policy positions in the State Department and Defense Department have yet to be filled, and the National Security Council is in disarray. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 10:26 am by Ed Stein
If lawyers at the State Department decide that Wittes and McCants are correct and the Brotherhood just doesn’t satisfy the statutory criteria for designation as an FTO, as the New York Times reported last night they may now believe, could President Trump’s Treasury still take action against the group? [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 9:00 pm by Dean Falvy
The Tenure in Office Act was repealed in 1887, and in the case of Myers v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:47 am by Olivier Moréteau
It develops the work of Ernest Weinribian corrective justice theorists to explain how the principle of legal coherence fits within the framework of corrective justice theory, and why legal coherence is the only valid conceptual basis for a doctrine of illegality. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:47 am by Olivier Moréteau
It develops the work of Ernest Weinribian corrective justice theorists to explain how the principle of legal coherence fits within the framework of corrective justice theory, and why legal coherence is the only valid conceptual basis for a doctrine of illegality. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]