Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF C. B., A CHILD"
Results 301 - 320
of 2,411
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2023, 9:37 am
Counsel argued that § 46b-56 (c) (13) would permit a Connecticut court to consider the cultural background of the child, i.e., the fact that the child had been born and raised as a Hasidic Jew in a Hasidic community, as part of a "best interest of the child" analysis. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 5:30 am
The district court noted that it may stay enforcement of a judgment while an appeal is pending pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 62(c) if the following factors support such a stay: "(1) whether the stay applicant has made a strong showing that [s]he is likely to succeed on the merits; (2) whether the applicant will be irreparably injured absent a stay; (3) whether issuance of the stay will substantially injure the other parties interested in the proceeding; and (4) where the public… [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 7:16 am
Sec. 31-23(b)(1). [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 1:07 pm
Notice 2011-84 provides guidance as to the corporate bond weighted average interest rate and the permissible range of interest rates specified under § 412(b)(5)(B)(ii)(II) of the Code as in effect for plan years beginning before 2008. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 8:17 am
In supplying the late Supplemental Report, Mother did not (a) tell Father or the court that another report was coming and that it would be delayed; (b) tell Father or the court why the Supplemental Report would be delayed; or (c) request a continuance of the hearing date. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 9:11 am
c. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 11:29 pm
Such factors should be considered only where, unlike here, the court is able to calculate the basic child support obligation pursuant to Family Court Act 413(1)(c). [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:55 pm
The names of the father of the B and C children, of T’s mother and Mr JM – especially in the Court of Appeal – should surely be public? [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 1:28 pm
(c) The court may not use the availability of electronic communication as a factor in support of a removal of a child by the custodial parent from Illinois. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 9:29 pm
(b) Only a parent who has been allocated a majority of parenting time may seek to relocate with a child, except that when parents have equal parenting time, either parent may seek to relocate with a child. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
Berg, 20 Misc. 3d 1142(A), 873 N.Y.S.2d 231, he noted that it was well-settled that a child support arbitration award may be vacated on public policy grounds if it fails to comply with the C.S.S.A. and is not in the best interests of the children. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 4:24 am
any other factor bearing on the child’s interest. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:57 am
The Court observed that the formula to determine temporary spousal maintenance that is outlined in Domestic Relations Law § 236(B)(5-a)(c) is intended to cover all of a payee spouse's basic living expenses, including housing costs, the costs of food and clothing, and other usual expenses (see Khaira v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 1:24 pm
(c) Upon a determination pursuant to subsection (b) of this section that a deferred sale of home order is indicated in order to minimize the adverse impact of divorce on the child, the court may make such an order. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 11:59 am
It also wise to check with your attorney whether your state has a statute that define the "best interest of the child" in terms of specific criteria. [read post]
Recent Cases: Administrative review of Child Support and Income Tax deductions in true joint custody
28 Aug 2007, 1:55 pm
Section 152 (c)(4)(B)(ii) grants the deduction to the person with the highest adjusted gross income where custody is shared equally. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 10:06 am
It, too, provided for vacation and modification of awards: c. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 4:31 pm
Copyright 2011 Irene C. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:48 am
A or B or C ~A B or C ~B ∴C The syllogism works as a valid form of argument if the premises are all true. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 9:22 am
” 750 ILCS 5/602.5(b) Most parents simply agree to make joint decisions for all significant matters in their child’s life. [read post]
