Search for: "INTERNATIONAL CUSTOM PRODUCTS V US" Results 301 - 320 of 2,178
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2013, 1:57 pm
Aug. 10, 2011) (industry custom and practice); Rivera Adams v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 4:05 am
  Plaintiffs quoted statements on Playtex’s website assuring customers that its products “surpass the most stringent domestic and international regulatory guidelines on . . . safety matters,” Am. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:57 pm by David Fraser
If you are served with a subpoena for personal information about a customer, you should immediately notify the customer. [read post]
Even prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, businesses across the country were embracing flextime, remote work (partial or full-time), and the use of virtual meetings to conduct routine business meetings, collaborate on projects, and pitch new deals to customers. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 9:17 pm
The patented system collects these raw us- age data records from their diffuse locations AMDOCS LIMITED v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 7:19 pm by Dennis Crouch
Lexmark International, Inc. sells its patented printer cartridges directly to customers and indirectly through authorized resellers. [read post]
4 May 2017, 4:00 am by Paula Bremner
In Excalibre Oil Tools Ltd. v Advantage Products Inc.[1], the court found the patentee had violated section 7(a) of the Trade-marks Act by sending overtly threatening letters to Excalibre’s mining customers. [read post]