Search for: "INVESTORS DOES 1-10" Results 301 - 320 of 3,063
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2023, 12:49 pm by Kevin LaCroix
A proxy for damages claimed by plaintiffs may not be an accurate determinant in predicting settlement outcomes because it does not apply the court-accepted event study methodology to effectively compute potential damages per share. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 6:33 pm
An way one looks at it, the situation in Cuba produces far more cynicism than it does either hope or re¡course to some saving ideology. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 2:35 pm by Rob Robinson
While ComplexDiscovery regularly highlights this information, it does not assume any responsibility for content assertions. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 1:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In a statement, Rodgers criticized the company for a “lack of clear investor communications,” adding that “we have poorly communicated on the status of Fab-1. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
In this complicated macroeconomic, political, and legal context, this fourth annual installment of Latham’s ESG Top 10 List highlights the ESG developments and trends that are likely to emerge in 2023. 1. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Posted by Charles McConnell, Xuan Jin, White & Case LLP, on Tuesday, January 10, 2023 Editor's Note: Charles McConnell is a Partner and Xuan Jin is Counsel at White & Case LLP. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Posted by Charles McConnell, Xuan Jin, White & Case LLP, on Tuesday, January 10, 2023 Editor's Note: Charles McConnell is a Partner and Xuan Jin is Counsel at White & Case LLP. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 9:26 am by Rob Robinson
While ComplexDiscovery regularly highlights this information, it does not assume any responsibility for content assertions. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:42 am by Kevin LaCroix
As 2022 came to an end, many SPAC sponsors and executives, concerned about the possible onset on January 1, 2023, of an excise tax on amounts to be returned to investors, moved to liquidate their SPACs. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 5:06 pm by Edwin Astudillo and Seth Lemings
New C&DI 102.10(b) provides examples of disclosures that would cause the non-GAAP reconciliation required by Item 10(e)(1)(i)(B) of Regulation S-K to make a non-GAAP measure more prominent than the comparable GAAP measure. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 1:47 pm by Kevin LaCroix
I hope you will please join us for the webinar. 1. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 11:50 pm by karp
This provision will not affect you if (1) you are an employee with an existing workplace plan, or (2) are an employer who has been in business for less than 3 years and employs 10 or fewer workers. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 7:24 am by Unknown
Slack concludes the shareholder does not have standing to sue over misrepresentations in the registration statement.The respondent shareholder counters that there is no conflict here because: (1) other cases involving registered and unregistered shares did not become available for trading on an exchange at exactly the same time unlike in this case; and (2) the phrase “such security” refers to any security of the same “nature and type” whether registered or… [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 6:52 am by Dan Lopez
In that context you have non-controlling minority where, for example, investors will have a non-controlling minority interest in a highly concentrated industry, but buy stocks and every single member of that industry are each market player. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 3:12 am by Jan von Hein
Reibetanz: Procedural Consumer Protection under Brussels Ibis Regulation and Determination of Jurisdiction under German Procedural Law (Sec. 36 (1) No. 3 ZPO) German procedural law does not provide for a place of jurisdiction comparable to Article 8 (1) Brussels Ibis Regulation, the European jurisdiction for joinder of parties. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 4:40 am by Guangjian Tu
Nonetheless, the arbitration-favored policy does not mean that the court will give effect to the arbitration agreement unconditionally. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 8:00 am by CFM Admin
Note that for SEC RIAs to private investment vehicles, a “client” for purposes of this rule refers to the vehicle(s) managed by the adviser and not the underlying investors. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by CFM Admin
Note that for SEC RIAs to private investment vehicles, a “client” for purposes of this rule refers to the vehicle(s) managed by the adviser and not the underlying investors. [read post]