Search for: "In Re: Garrett"
Results 301 - 320
of 436
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2007, 3:09 am
The whole point of a dreadful set of Rehnquist Court decisions, including Boerne (unconstitutionality of RFRA), Morrison (unconstitutionality of Violence Against Women Act a), and Garrett (unconstitutionality of applying American With Disabilities Act Against States in order to achieve damages remedies), is to stop in its tracks any notion tht Congress should be taken seriously as an independent partner in the enterprise of constitutional interpretation. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
. : University Press of Kansas, c2010.Appellate Advocacy(RES) KF251 .B42 2010A practical guide to appellate advocacy / Mary Beth Beazley.Beazley, Mary Beth, 1957-Austin [Tex.] : Wolters Kluwer Law & Business ; New York : Aspen Publishers, c2010.BankruptcyKF1524 .C4194 2010Chapter 7 consumer bankruptcy strategies : leading lawyers on preparing a chapter 7 filing, establishing effective client strategies, and understanding recent trends. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 12:55 pm
They’re just upset because they’re losing customers” (Masood, London Uber driver). [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Seated two rows in front of me, in the “Reserved for Legal Team and Guests” zone, are two of the three defendants—Garrett Miller and Joseph Fischer—and their wives. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 1:25 am
UNITED KINGDOM BREXIT UPDATE The UK and the EU reached a deal that, from 1 January 2021, governs key aspects of the trade relationship between the two parties. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 11:21 am
We’re just really happy that they did! [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:25 pm
They’re zealots; I call them Nancy Grace prosecutors. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 5:45 am
They're there to assist the person in spiritual growth. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 6:29 am
The fact that we're sure? [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 10:59 am
/Dec. 2014), Garrett M. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 4:58 pm
" "I am so disappointed with [Dean Garrett] and his decision. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 9:04 am
For these reasons, it’s often not wise to enter into a quick settlement with an insurance company before you know exactly what you’re dealing with. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 3:15 pm
And six months later, you’re saying, maybe not. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:33 am
Commentary on the case comes from Ruthann Robson at Constitutional Law Prof Blog, who writes that the Court’s “relatively short and unanimous opinion breaks no new ground”; from Garrett Epps of The Atlantic, who predicts that both the Ohio law at issue in the case and other similar laws will “go down in the next few years”; from Lisa Soronen at the blog of the National Conference of State Legislatures, who observes that the case “should be of more… [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 7:38 am
And as a practical matter, they're important because they're the basis for how LBB makes all sorts of other calculations.Speaking of which, no one brought up the question of fiscal notes, but given these projections - prisons full with demand rising slightly, but much higher if diversion programs are cut - to me a critical question facing LBB is whether criminal penalty enhancements will begin to receive positive fiscal notes. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 1:32 pm
In Maryland, legalization passed in every county but one (and in that county (Garrett) lost by only six percentage points). [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 11:00 pm
They're hiring him to be the head coach. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 6:05 am
Commentary on the Court’s decision comes from: Noah Feldman at Bloomberg View, who contends that “[t]he whole sordid tale can tell us something important about how the court does its business today when interpreting statutes”; Garrett Epps of The Atlantic, who applauds the decision on the ground that “[p]rosecutorial overreach happens every day” and contends that “it is to the Court’s credit that six of its justices contented themselves with… [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 3:31 am
I attribute this to the effort of co-president Cynthia Garrett, and applaud her efforts. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:48 am
“It isn’t even a measure of the differences in standards of evidence,” [Cynthia] Garrett added. [read post]
