Search for: "In Re: M., Mark, III"
Results 301 - 320
of 405
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2010, 9:54 pm
Berry, Professor of Law and Director, Graduate Program in Intellectual Property Law, Thomas M. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm
Richard Sindelar III .... [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
The “M” stands for “magnetic,” and those devices certainly are. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 2:08 pm
” I’m guessing the answer to that one is yes? [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
While many consider these general principles to be a secondary source of international law that “may be invoked as supplementary rules… where appropriate” (14), some consider them on an “footing of formal equality with the two positivist elements of custom and treaty”. (15) Examples are the principles of res judicata, equity, justice, and estoppel. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 7:28 am
The other two products involved were “Farmer’s Secret Berry & Produce Cleaner,” an unregistered pesticide, and “PiC BORIC ACID Roach Killer III,” which was misbranded because EPA-approved labels were upside-down or inside out, making them hard to read. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm
As did this customs agent, on Scott Henson’s (Grits For Breakfast) Constitution-Day return to the U.S. from Canada wearing a t-shirt memorializing the Fourth Amendment: “That’s a great t-shirt,” he announced with a grin, “I’m a big fan of the US Constitution, especially the Second Amendment. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 7:56 am
I’m at a conference today, so I can’t provide longer case summaries. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 9:56 pm
Three quick thoughts on the subject: (i) If knowledge is power, the IP Tsar should be able to assemble and distribute it with the greatest facility; (ii) Debate tends to focus mainly on IP's civil law aspects, but the Tsar's role may be far more important on the criminal side; (iii) The brief of the Tsar might include encouraging the many and varied pro-IP groups to rationalise wasteful duplication at all levels of their operations.What is the effect of Article 96 of the Community… [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 12:20 pm
Gary asked me to appear with him and Mark at the U.S. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Harvie Wilkinson III wrote. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm
In the August 2010 volume of The Colorado Lawyer, Ronald M. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 6:05 pm
They’re the people who make money out of thin air, right? [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 7:28 am
[M]ost courts will find an absence of causation as a matter of law where the physician testifies that he or she never read the warnings given.2010 WL 2765358, at *5 (citations and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:18 pm
If the attorneys who think they're worth $2900/hour are missing this basic issue-spotting that I caught, maybe I'm worth $3000/hour and even more underpaid than I thought. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
Stevens is the last of them, and his departure will mark a cultural milestone. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 8:45 am
You're covered if nobody knows except those who are in the club. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:29 am
Practitioners will find it interesting, if not useful, that the court was prepared to use trade mark cases to inform the requisite knowledge required in a DMCA case. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
From 1986-1998, I was a professor at the LSU Paul M. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:36 pm
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 marked an important turning point in this miserable history, as Congress finally acknowledged that facilities-based competition was possible and preferable to the regulated monopoly era of the past. [read post]
