Search for: "In Re Adoption of Steven S."
Results 301 - 320
of 762
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
[Plaintiff’s] interpretation of Connecticut’s registration statute is expansive. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 6:43 am
” Federal: Battle over Scalia’s Replacement Already Spilling into Senate RacesWashington Post – Steven Mufson and Juliet Eilperin | Published: 2/15/2016 Advocacy groups are gearing up for a fierce political fight over President Obama’s pick to fill the U.S. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 4:30 am
Stevens held some things preempted and some things not, but good luck figuring that out once you're down to actual cases. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
The transmittal of a draft of a preliminary opinion that was never adopted, signed or sent to all counsel is not a binding ruling. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 4:04 am
Here’s an excerpt from near the end: STEVEN BOCHNER: We have a few more minutes. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:27 am
July 24, 2015); and most recently, Stevens v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 8:43 pm
That’s nonsense. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
The case of Steven Truscott illustrates two of the main issues with the current review process. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 8:56 am
Lawyers who do not adopt tech will fail, ditto for law firms. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:12 am
Charles Blustein OrtmanAppointed by Assembly Speaker: Steven Goldstein, Esq.Appointed by Governor: Robert Bresenhan, Jr.Stephen J. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
The Court held that the standard required when reviewing a contractual decision is akin to that adopted for judicial review of administrative action (i.e. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
Civ. 1ère, No. 13-23566.March was all about the 'Blurred Lines' in copyright and a US Jury's decision to award $7.3 million to the Estate of Marvin Gaye on the basis that Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke’s soul-inspired pop song "Blurred Lines" too closely mirrored Gaye’s 1977 single "Got to Give It Up". [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:26 am
The draft EU Directive for trade secret protection is currently making its way through the legislative process with no firm timeline for adoption. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 2:25 pm
A California Supreme Court decision last March (In re Taylor) lifted the residency restriction in San Diego County, finding it impossible to enforce, but declined to do so for the state's other 57 counties. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Bodie S. [read post]
Argument analysis: Justices spar with counsel over excluding securities litigation from state courts
2 Dec 2015, 5:25 am
Although the topic only came up briefly in the argument, Breyer’s comment suggested that he found the absence of the Solicitor General as telling as the absence of barking that Holmes found remarkable in Silver Blaze — but perhaps at this late date Breyer had the Broadway play more in mind than the classic short story to which the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justice John Paul Stevens referred so frequently. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Or conversely, that we should never re-examine such honors? [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 10:03 am
What do courts actually do — and what should they do — when they’re faced with a situation like this? [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 8:57 am
The Act was originally adopted in 1878, to prevent Union troops from enforcing Restoration laws (such as patrolling polling places). [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 12:51 pm
Whether you’re negotiating, involved in mediation, litigating or trying to win an argument at the dinner table your proposal may be more effective if it’s not only specific to the person you’re talking to but to a particular part of the person’s brain. [read post]
