Search for: "In Re Clement" Results 301 - 320 of 633
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2012, 11:55 am by Lyle Denniston
   Saying “we’re all under the gun,” the Chief Justice implied there was no time for further explanations. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 6:03 pm
Solicitor General Paul Clement, the Bush administration's top Supreme Court lawyer, argued that the law is constitutional and assured justices that it meant to apply to people peddling child pornography.It would not apply to individuals like movie critics from writing about scenes involving adolescent sex in legitimate films like "Lolita," "Traffic" and "American Beauty," Clement said. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 8:23 am
Clement argued that the statute clearly had hybrid purposes. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 8:09 am by Ronald Mann
And then you say that by adding the word “full,” … you want to use the word “full” to suggest that it’s not the 1920 costs we’re talking about at all. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 12:05 pm
(How many people using e-mail know that they're using SMTP or POP3? [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 3:26 pm by Amanda Shanor
” In response, Clement pressed the idea, to which he returned throughout the argument, that it’s not that the number generator has to literally do the storing (or for that matter, the dialing), but instead that “you’re using the number generator … as part of the process of storing telephone numbers to be called or part of the process of dialing telephone numbers to be called. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 3:56 am by Gritsforbreakfast
These are the units that will have it: Clements Connally Crain Michael Stiles Wynne Jester Garza Hutchins Montford Travis and Sanchez.TBH, families still seemed freaked out about visitation - and generally - despite those assurances. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 8:01 am
Clement, a former Solicitor General of the United States, is an excellent lawyer, so he gave the answer that best served his clients: it doesn’t matter. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 8:59 pm by Josh Blackman
And they're certainly part of the larger "appeal" currently before our court. [read post]