Search for: "In Re Emergency Amendment to Florida Rules"
Results 301 - 314
of 314
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
According to one press report, Angel Diaz "appeared to be moving 24 minutes after the first injection, grimacing, blinking, licking his lips, blowing and appearing to mouth words". [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 9:57 pm
Lightbourne filed an Emergency PetitionSeeking to Invoke This Court's All Writs Jurisdiction. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 12:13 am
Lightbourne filed an Emergency PetitionSeeking to Invoke This Court's All Writs Jurisdiction.2. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 6:16 am
We defer ruling at this time on the propriety of these claims in regard to the remaining named Petitioners. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 3:39 am
We're sort of at a temporary stopping point. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 6:59 am
We're sort of at a temporary stopping point. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Smith, Who Says You're Disabled? [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 6:31 am
In the event of an emergency early in the launch (say the booster explodes on the pad) the purpose of the tower jet was to lift the command module up and away high enough that the parachutes could work and the spacecraft could safely land in the water just off the Florida coast. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Smith, Who Says You're Disabled? [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:29 pm
In response, we reanalyze our data, separating the individuals from the corporations; in every case the re-analyzed data support the conclusions of our original paper to the same extent or more strongly. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Outside of the five main executing states of Texas, Virginia, Oklahoma, Missouri and Florida, this figure rises to one in five for the remaining 28 jurisdictions that have executed since 1977. [read post]
17 May 2007, 10:26 am
Check with your lawyer to confirm state law – some states have case law or other executive rulings that apply to gender identity discrimination. [read post]
7 May 2007, 9:54 am
Smith, Who Says You're Disabled? [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 10:12 pm
This is the dynamic we're all used to: the operation of the Fourth Amendment's exclusionary rule.There is another, less well-known dynamic, one that arises under Rule 41(g) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. [read post]
