Search for: "In Re Kerr"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,239
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2009, 1:17 pm
So you're expecting a post about the beginning of the 2009-10 term of the United States Supreme Court? [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 11:02 am
(Orin Kerr) The decision handed down this morning is United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 1:43 pm
(Orin Kerr) Last week’s post, What Should Conservative Lower Court Judges Do With Liberal Supreme Court Precedents? [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 5:51 am
It thus struck me, when a mind as sharp as Orin Kerr's offered a CLE at Volokh Conspiracy, that it commanded attention. [read post]
28 May 2024, 4:07 am
At Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr raises an interesting point about what he calls “meaning assignment. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 11:20 am
But to my mind, there's nothing wrong with using pro bono for part of marketing, so long as you're clear about your intentions. [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 6:15 am
You're super nice. [read post]
23 May 2011, 3:06 am
You're young, strong and perky. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:04 am
Via Orin Kerr and John Wesley Hall, a California Court of Appeals held that night vision goggles are a constitutionally acceptable means of seeing what you couldn't otherwise see. in People v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:53 pm
(Orin Kerr) I recently blogged about United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 8:16 am
You’re up, Judge Gorsuch.] [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
(Please, give us something, we’re dying over here!) [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm
Lord Kerr (for the minority) noted that REP was the “touchstone” of private life (applying Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457). [read post]
1 May 2012, 2:51 am
Current confirmed speakers on this distinguished panel include Christopher Slobogin, Vanderbilt University Law School, Tracy Meares, Yale Law School, and Orin Kerr, George Washington University School of Law. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 7:34 pm
The Conservative Party of Canada has announced as part of the current federal election campaign that if re-elected, it will bring forward legislation to ban spam. [read post]
10 May 2011, 7:45 pm
“We’re trying to get you to give us some help,” the judge said, “with this distinction you think is so important. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 4:45 pm
(Orin Kerr) Lawyers often explore legal arguments by offering “hypotheticals,” or “hypos” for short. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 8:16 am
(Orrin Kerr has a nice post on the article.) [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 6:41 am
And under Whren, the Court allows such steps even if they’re the real reason the officer made the stop. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 5:53 am
They’re not really criminal defense lawyers. [read post]
