Search for: "In Re Nielsen"
Results 301 - 320
of 428
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2011, 5:39 am
In fact, based on a recent Nielsen study, some are asserting that, based on recent sales figures, iPads are replacing those devices. [read post]
16 May 2011, 7:34 am
Knowing Your Value: Women, Money and Getting What You’re Worth by Mika Brzezinski. [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:30 pm
According to the Second Circuit, Stolt-Nielsen was inapposite: "Stolt-Nielsen states that parties cannot be forced to engage in a class arbitration absent a contractual agreement to do so. [read post]
2 May 2011, 1:26 pm
In AT&T Mobility, the Court re-affirmed its prior conclusion in Hall Street that the only valid grounds for vacatur under the FAA are found in Section 10 of the FAA. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:17 pm
Last June, the Supreme Court held in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 11:09 am
For example, in In re American Express Merchants’ Litigation, No. 06-1871-cv, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals recently reaffirmed its decision invalidating a class arbitration waiver after an earlier decision was vacated by the Court to reconsider in light Stolt-Nielsen, S.A. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 10:05 am
The following is a list of the bestselling hardcover business books as ranked by the Wall Street Journal with data from Nielsen BookScan. 1. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:09 am
Many interesting articles in March on arbitration. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:19 pm
Specifically, the Supreme Court remanded In re American Express with directions that the Second Circuit take account of its decision in Stolt-Nielsen, S. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:01 pm
NOTHING IN THIS BANKRUPTCY BLOG CONSTITUTES LEGAL ADVICE RE A CHAPTER 7, CHAPTER 13, CHAPTER 11, OR CHAPTER 12. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:50 pm
Blum: mostly they’re just interested in doing it by automation. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 8:40 am
Court of Appeals in New York City has once again held that a class action waiver provision contained in commercial contracts between merchants and charge card issuer/servicer American Express Co. was unenforceable.In light of its 2010 decision in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:25 am
There was no dispute as to whether the Plaintiff had executed the arbitration agreement, containing the class waiver, however the court held that the class waiver was unenforceable, after a lengthy discussion of Second Circuit law and the impact of the recent United States Supreme Court case, Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:03 am
Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 5:16 am
The court’s earlier decision in In re Am. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 9:34 am
In a ruling on March 8 in In Re AMEX Merchants' Litigation, No. 06-1871 (2d Cir. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 9:34 am
In a ruling on March 8 in In Re AMEX Merchants' Litigation, No. 06-1871 (2d Cir. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 11:39 am
Supreme Court in In re American Express Merchants’ Litigation, No. 06-1871-cv. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:35 am
At a theoretical level, this paper explores both the limits on parties' ability to regulate procedure by contract (at issue in the Supreme Court's recent Rent-A-Center decision) and the scope of an arbitrator's ability to fill gaps in parties' procedural contracts (at issue in the Supreme Court's recent Stolt-Nielsen decision). [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 5:29 pm
Supreme Court's ruling last year in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
