Search for: "In Re Opinion of Supreme Court, Etc."
Results 301 - 320
of 986
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2017, 7:33 am
Although some have argued that Dookhan’s dry-labbing demonstrates the necessity of the Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 6:00 am
Because a fiscal plan certified by the oversight board is conclusive and nonreviewable, a Title III court is likely to accord great deference to the oversight board’s determination that a specific PPP satisfies this “economic growth” requirement, and absent a successful challenge to PROMESA itself, would by its terms lack authority to hear any dispute regarding such determination.[6] Thus, if a certified fiscal plan prioritizes PPP transactions as part of a Title III plan… [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 9:09 pm
The McHenry-Meeks bill cites an obscure Supreme Court case, Nichols v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 12:42 pm
We can see similar problems arise in the Supreme Court’s more recent decision in Taniguchi v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 2:10 pm
Apparently not so much to the California Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
In what some commentators believe is one of the most important cases of the Supreme Court’s recently concluded term, Matal v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 10:15 am
Intervention of the court is envisaged in few circumstances only, like, in case of fraud or bias by the arbitrators, violation of natural justice, etc. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 11:17 am
Just like they control what team you play for in the minor leagues, how long you're bound to a given club once you're drafted, etc. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am
The Court characterized the government’s affirmative burden as “heavy. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:51 am
Ernde wrote in an email that the agency would use its ongoing studies to make recommendations to the Supreme Court about the bar exam.Second are the remarks from David L. [read post]
31 May 2017, 2:06 pm
Here’s the proviso’s complete text, which for some reason has never been fully quoted or addressed in any of the court opinions (hence the need for amici to jump in): EFFECTIVE DATES SEC. 2664. [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:38 am
Between now and an injunction decision, the FTC's findings will have to be discussed since they're highly relevant. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 am
I had read in Reason magazine about the work IJ co-founder Clint Bolick (now Justice Bolick of the Arizona Supreme Court) was doing at a tiny shop he had just started called the Center for Civil Rights. [read post]
5 May 2017, 9:12 am
How does the Supreme Court’s opinion last Term in Cuozzo Speed Techs., LLC v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 10:33 am
However, there were no restrictions on non-cash transactions such as checks, credit/debit cards, etc. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
It is an antidemocratic text, obtained by ordinary, interest-driven politics that, through both tactic and luck, manipulated and evaded public opinion. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 12:00 am
Statistics show that, during 2016, 35 technical investigators had been appointed by the Beijing IP Court in 352 cases, who submitted 262 technical opinions and many of the opinions were adopted by judges. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am
Z on property, etc. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 7:49 am
He notes three constitutional doctrines in the area of federalism that recent Supreme Court jurisprudence has emphasized, all viewed by many as conservative moves, and argues that they will have progressive effects. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm
A fitting starting point is a case many lawyers are familiar with: Rector, Etc. of Holy Trinity Church v. [read post]
