Search for: "In Re Opinion of the Justices." Results 301 - 320 of 14,073
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2008, 9:59 pm
Which I wish I could say would be a hundredth as interesting as Justice Robie's opinion. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 12:16 pm by Ronald Mann
My reading of the argument is that the principal question remaining is whether AMG will be the first opinion from the January argument calendar or whether the justices will find some other case that seems even more obvious to them. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 9:02 am
Whatever floats your boat.Now, from ancillary details in Justice Wiley's opinion, I get the incredibly strong sense that Mr. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 6:58 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
And I suspect the majority knows, like Justice Scalia admitted in other contexts, that they’re on the wrong side of history; hence, the expansive dicta. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 11:17 am by Vince Chhabria
If you’re interested, a video excerpt of the chat is below. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 6:34 am by MBettman
In a unanimous opinion written by Justice Lanzinger, the court answered yes to both questions. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 12:26 pm by David Ettinger
  We’re guessing it has to do with Justice Carlos Moreno’s impending retirement and the fact that he will not serve as a pro tem justice. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 10:39 am by Joe Mullin
“We conclude that the challenged statement, that ATL is a well-known patent troll, is one of opinion rather than fact,” write the New Hampshire justices. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 12:36 pm by Tom Smith
 I think it's a difficult art to predict a Justice's opinion from his questions. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:54 am by Steve Kalar
The opinion on the Ninth’s web site appears redacted (compare it to the WL opinion), but this case should not be cited until clearly re-issued. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 6:29 am
We'll continue to monitor the CCAs to the extent that they make their opinions publicly available.This week at the court-martial level: I'm unaware of any significant trial-level activity this week.As always, please let us know if you're aware of any military justice developments or upcoming significant events. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 5:43 pm by lennyesq
Pataki in 2005. *** Judge Cherished Opinions Standing Up for the ‘Little Guy’ In In re Golden, 56 AD3d 1109 (2008), Justice Cardona concluded that both common law and state Human Services Law permit transgendered individuals to legally assume a new name to reflect their new identification; in People v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 12:02 pm by Quinta Jurecic, Natalie K. Orpett
  We’re not arguing for any specific investigative or prosecutorial steps, the utility of which would be hard to gauge in the absence of more information about where the criminal probe stands. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 1:50 pm
 But you can probably figure out which way the Court of Appeal goes on this issue by the mere fact that the opinion by Justice Dondero contains references to Columbine, Sandy Hook, and Virginia Tech.Sawed-off shotguns in high schools. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 2:07 pm by Rick Hills
., Brian Slocum's fine piece) and even one judge (Justice Kavanaugh in a widely cited book review) have noted, few concepts are less clear than the concept of legal clarity. [read post]
24 May 2011, 5:21 am by Monroe Freedman
  The language and the photographs in the majority opinion make it clear that any conception of what is cruel and unusual - an essentially moral concept - must include the brutalization of the victims of the California prison system.The justices in the minority are capable of being morally offended by what they consider to be excessive punitive damages against corporations, but cannot find sufficient cruelty in the inhumanity of the California prisons. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 10:47 pm
Trying to slip this unpersuasive opinion past military justice practitioners while they're semi-comatose from tryptophan overload would have been a far better idea than publishing it.Here's the essence of the opinion:[W]e find appellant's rights under Article 31, UCMJ . . . were triggered when appellant was interviewed at the same time and location by a special agent of the U.S. [read post]