Search for: "In The Matter Of: N.A" Results 301 - 320 of 600
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2011, 2:03 am by Blog Editorial
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 Al Rawi and others (Respondents) v The Security Service and others (Appellants), heard 24 -27 January 2011 Home Office (Appellant) v Tariq (Respondent), heard 24 – 27 January 2011 R (on the… [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:37 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Farkas contends that Wells Fargo is not the mortgagee because "[t]he purported assignment of the Deed of Trust is ineffective to transfer the security interest to Wells Fargo as a matter of law" because "Wells Fargo does not hold the subject debt." [read post]
8 Jun 2013, 11:21 am by Florian Mueller
The other major difference is that Nokia, Huawei and ZTE proposal a "Trial on FRAND Counterclaims Only" (InterDigital is trying to get all FRAND counterclaims thrown out, but I believe it will at most get a limited part of them dismissed) to be held two months before the infringement trial, while the related column in InterDigital and Samsung's proposal just says "N.A [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 1:44 pm
§3212[b]), sufficiently to warrant the court as a matter of law to direct judgment in his or her favor. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
     On March 31, 2014, the Supreme Court of the United States denied certiorari in Bank of America, N.A. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am by Wolfgang Demino
Available at: http://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol92/iss2/12 Madden v Midland involved debt that was not only in delinquent, but already charged off by the original creditor (FIA Card Services p/k/a Bank of America, N.A.). [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am by Wolfgang Demino
Available at: http://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol92/iss2/12 Madden v Midland involved debt that was not only in delinquent, but already charged off by the original creditor (FIA Card Services p/k/a Bank of America, N.A.). [read post]