Search for: "In The Matter Of: S.C.R."
Results 301 - 320
of 374
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2011, 8:36 pm
MacDonald, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 138 at pp. 138-39 [in the headnote], 93 D.L.R. (4th) 415, stated as follows: The patient is not entitled to the records themselves. [read post]
26 May 2009, 9:50 pm
Hutson et al, [1937] S.C.R. 294, for the principle that: … the fact that an operation is under the control of the defendant coupled with the fact that the accident is such that in the ordinary course of things it would not happen if those having the management use proper care, is sufficient to establish a prima facie case of negligence. [23] … [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 10:00 am
Mann, 2004 SCC 52, [2004] 3 S.C.R. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:26 am
Minister of National Revenue, [1975] 2 S.C.R. 248. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 11:42 am
Section 5(2) then says that a person with a claim “shall be presumed to have known of the matters referred to in clause (1) (a) on the day the act or omission on which the claim is based took place, unless the contrary is proved. [read post]
23 May 2021, 7:21 pm
In Tolofson, at p. 1049 S.C.R., La Forest J. explained the distinction as follows: [The real and substantial connection] test has the effect of preventing a court from unduly entering into matters in which the jurisdiction in which it is located has little interest. [read post]
28 May 2009, 9:04 am
Marie, [1978] 2 S.C.R. 1299, in a different context [read post]
26 May 2013, 3:05 am
Mierzwinski, [1982] 1 S.C.R. 860 at 875. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 6:08 pm
.), [ 1991] 1 S.C.R. 742 and R. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 4:00 am
Zelensky, [1978] 2 S.C.R. 940, the Supreme Court of Canada made it clear that restitution orders fall under jurisdiction of the criminal courts because they are part of the sentencing process. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 6:50 pm
Time (2012 SCC 8, [2012] 1 S.C.R. 265), under the Quebec Consumer Protection Act not the Competition Act). [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
Goertz, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 27, in the context of a divorce proceeding. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 4:16 am
Justice Binnie provided useful factors to be considered in determining whether one is serving the role of conduit (SOCAN at para. 101): I conclude that the Copyright Act, as a matter of legislative policy established by Parliament, does not impose liability for infringement on intermediaries who supply software and hardware to facilitate use of the Internet. [read post]
5 May 2014, 6:16 am
The Board’s decision in the Breakthrough Films case was a missed opportunity to help documentary film makers, who are frequently given overly cautious and even bad advice on such matters. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
Perspective matters as well as values. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 9:07 am
Daviault, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 63 The Supreme Court created an exception to that rule. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
Canada (Attorney General), [1995] 3 S.C.R. 199, at para. 153, per McLachlin J. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 9:07 am
Daviault, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 63 The Supreme Court created an exception to that rule. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 4:00 am
” (4) “In 2009, the Ontario Civil Legal Needs Project found that one-third of low- and middle-income Ontarians did not seek legal assistance for what they regarded as legal problems”; and, (5) “A recent study of 259 self-represented litigants in family and civil law matters in Ontario, British Columbia and Alberta reported that the most consistently cited reason for self-representation was the inability to afford to retain, or continue to retain, a lawyer. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 2:04 am
National Post [2010] 1 S.C.R. 477 considered the issue of the legal obligations of a journalist when he is supplied with untrue information. [read post]
