Search for: "In The Matter Of: S.C.R." Results 301 - 320 of 374
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2010, 3:17 am by Michael Fitzgibbon
Canada (Treasury Board) 1987 CanLII 73 (S.C.C.), [1987] 2 S.C.R. 84 at pp. 89-90). [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 6:07 am by Federal and Extradition Defense
Extradition from CanadaBy Karen Molle * Every now and again, the characters on the American legal drama Law and Order have a problem - the suspect has fled to Canada. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:14 am by emagraken
Foundation Co. of Canada, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 695. [15]         Moreover, I do not think that the precise terms of the third party notice can be determinative of this application, as the defendants are at liberty to apply to amend the terms of the third party notice [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:53 pm by Robert Tanha
Trochym, 2007 SCC 6 (CanLII), 2007 SCC 6, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 239, at para. 82). [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 10:30 pm by Daniel Mol
Khadr [2010] 1 S.C.R. 44, the intervenor the National Council for the Protection of Canadians Abroad argued such a duty exists (Dean Peroff of Toronto, counsel). [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 8:11 am by emagraken
  It is well-settled that an appellant court must exercise great restraint in reviewing such matters. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Angela Swan
At bottom, law is about doing things in the real world where it matters that the right or correct things are done. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 4:00 am by Dianne Saxe
The matter became political. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:05 am by INFORRM
In WIC Radio Ltd v Simpson [2008] 2 S.C.R. 420, the court broadened the range of circumstances in which defendants can rely on the defence of fair comment. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:15 pm by MacIsaac
Minister of National Revenue, [1975] 2 S.C.R. 248 at 254: Lord Guest in Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 4:45 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Longueuil (City), 1997 CanLII 335 (S.C.C.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 844, at para. 52, and the Constitution Act, 1867, ss. 92(8) and 92(16).) [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 7:21 pm by MacIsaac
Evans [1993] 3 S.C.R. 653, at page 664: The rationale for admitting admissions has a different basis than other exceptions to the hearsay rule. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 1:54 pm by MacIsaac
The question is whether, with appropriate instructions in the circumstances, the jury will be able to dispel the matters of concern from their minds. [5]             The jury’s role is to be an impartial arbiter and accordingly, direct appeals to the jurors’ sympathies divert them from this important responsibility. [read post]