Search for: "In re: L.J. & L.J" Results 301 - 320 of 363
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2009, 10:00 pm
Ritts, "Preemption and Medical Devices: A Response to Adler and Mann," 51 Food &;amp; Drug L.J. 1, 6 n.21 (1996).After Lohr came down, we thought those words had been relegated to the dustbin of legal history. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:00 pm
This, in turn, will also almost certainly require a re-thinking of the rules governing data sharing. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 3:44 am
Stuart Weinberg has a piece in the WSJ entitled: What business owners should know about patenting which includes text (in the form of an interview with James McDonough) about obtaining patents -->It is getting harder to a certain degree. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 12:49 pm
It's hard to believe that the Court and litigants would be divided so sharply on an issue with such apparent lack of consequence--by letting total harm damages erupt without any procedural or substantive safeguards so long as the courts or legislatures say they're not punishing, they're just regulating. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 9:51 pm
See Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure, Section 1210.06(b), Fourth Edition (April 2005); citing In re Perry Mfg. [read post]